I was hoping on some feedback as far as the pro's and cons of both stations/repeaters. (quantar vs mtr2000) My department is cheap (as most are) and stuff will only ever get replaced when it fails. Well currently our main is a 9yr old or so quantar standby is an old micor and we have 1 msr2000 reciever. The quantar main works good but the standby x-mitter is crappy and the recieve side of it is 1/2 deef the msr 2000 reciever is also deef, our current radio shop actually gave us the msr and rigged it up as a reciever.
If budjet was no concern obviously quantar or newer would be the way to go, but if we had a chance to upgrade all at once and put in new recivers/and a standby in what would we be giving up by going from a quantar based system to a majority of mtr2000's. Wea are in the 464.500 mghz range and astro will never be in the cards for us. What do you folks think?
Quantar vs. Mtr2000
Moderator: Queue Moderator
-
Radiogeek97
- Batboard $upporter
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:48 am
..
if you are never going digital, then you definately don't need the quantar.
you can get at least 2 MTR stations for the price of a quantar too.
i'd say you should transition to MTR!
doug
you can get at least 2 MTR stations for the price of a quantar too.
i'd say you should transition to MTR!
doug
BRAVO MIKE JULIET ALPHA
"You can do whatever you want, there are just consequences..."
IF SOMEONE PM'S YOU - HAVE THE COURTESY TO REPLY.
"You can do whatever you want, there are just consequences..."
IF SOMEONE PM'S YOU - HAVE THE COURTESY TO REPLY.