XTS 5000 Audio volume Digital vs. Conventional

This forum is dedicated to discussions pertaining specifically to the Motorola ASTRO line of radios (those that use VSELP/IMBE/AMBE), including using digital modulation, digital programming, FlashPort upgrades, etc. If you have general questions please use the General or Programming forums.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Jayce
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: XTS/XTL & APX6000 & APX/XE

XTS 5000 Audio volume Digital vs. Conventional

Post by Jayce »

A couple of years ago we 'uppgraded' from MTS2000s to XTS5000s for our public safety folks. Last year we upgraded our Smartzone system to 4.1. Most of the cops don't really like the XTS. They complain that the volume is lower than the MTS. (and it's bigger,heavier) It seems that way to me too. Due to political restraints, we have not switched over to digital comms. On the few digital channels we have , the audio output is significantly higher than that of the conventional audio. Audio levels throughout the system are supposedly set in the same ballpark. There's no real problem here, just wondering if others have noticed the same situation. It is an impossible task, but we do try to keep our cops happy.

Merry Christmas to all.
RKG
Posts: 2629
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by RKG »

For transmit audio, there is a parameter called something like "digital/analog audio balance" on the radio configuration/radio wide page.

For receive audio, the problem may lie in the spectral differences between analog audio and recovered digital audio. We found that some tinkering with the values on the "Rx Audio" tab (something like that) of radio configuration/radio wide page helped to make the Rx audio sound like the analog radios that had been previously in use. We didn't do this scientifically or take notes, so I don't remember exactly what changes we made.
User avatar
xmo
Moderator
Posts: 2549
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by xmo »

Motorola made some audio enhancement changes a few years back [preceeding your system] They issued PSB907B which describes these changes. Although the changes would already be implemented in your case, you might find the document useful to explain how all the adjustments interact.
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Post by tvsjr »

Jayce-

What DSP version are you running in the XTS3000s? I'm wondering if you're on an older DSP... in my experience, DSP8 has far less audio balance issues (and far better recovered audio quality) than its predecessors.
User avatar
mr.syntrx
Posts: 1587
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 10:09 pm

Post by mr.syntrx »

There's a DSP8 for the XTS5000? :)
RocketNJ
Posts: 584
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by RocketNJ »

Nope.
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Post by tvsjr »

Duh, I thought I read 3000. Ignore the idiot in the corner. :oops:
mike m
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by mike m »

I made some measurements on the most recent DSP versions and found that the digital audio on the 800 MHz XTS3000 is 3 dB lower than that of the 700/800 MHz XTS5000.

In other bands, UHF and VHF, they are the same. This is the result of the MIDRANGE EQUILIZATION being permantly enabled on the XTS5000 700/800 radios.

In the XTS5000 you have a lot of receiver audio gain controls for analog, digital and securenet.

I set my 700/800 MHz XTS5000 digital gain to around -29 to make the audio sound the same whether using a XTS3000 or XTS5000.

Don't touch the analog received setting as it royally screws up the de-emphasis curve.



Mike
Post Reply

Return to “Legacy Batboard Motorola ASTRO (VSELP/IMBE/AMBE) Equipment Forum”