XTL 2500 Scan List

This forum is dedicated to discussions pertaining specifically to the Motorola ASTRO line of radios (those that use VSELP/IMBE/AMBE), including using digital modulation, digital programming, FlashPort upgrades, etc. If you have general questions please use the General or Programming forums.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
xntexan
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 11:03 am

XTL 2500 Scan List

Post by xntexan »

Does anyone know what the max # of scan channels is for the XTL 2500 (M5 control head)?
User avatar
alex
Administrator
Posts: 5762
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by alex »

Conventional: 16
Trunking: 10

I don't think this has changed from the "motorola standard" of scanable channels.

The theory (I'd think) behind these limits are that if you have 100 scannable channels, there's no way that you will have a chance to reliably catch every bit of chatter on each channel in a manner which would be useful to the average radio user.

-Alex
The Radio Information Board: http://www.radioinfoboard.com
Your source for information on: Harris/Ma-Comm/EFJ/RELM/Kenwood/ICOM/Thales, equipment.
User avatar
N4DES
was KS4VT
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 7:59 am
What radios do you own?: APX,XTS2500,XTL2500,XTL1500

Post by N4DES »

This is actually an APCO 16 requirement that wasn't
changed when APCO 25 came around. It's not a Motorola
standard, they just complied with it.
RKG
Posts: 2629
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by RKG »

The 15+1 for conventional and 10+1 for trunked radios standard long antedates APCO 16.
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Post by tvsjr »

Of course, they could have had the RSS pop up a window saying "scanning so many channels isn't a good idea!" then let you do it anyway.

<grumble />
RKG
Posts: 2629
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by RKG »

I think it has to do with memory partitioning, though doubtless way back when someone concluded that, for the intended public safety use, scanning more than this number of channels would not be in demand.
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Post by tvsjr »

RKG wrote:I think it has to do with memory partitioning, though doubtless way back when someone concluded that, for the intended public safety use, scanning more than this number of channels would not be in demand.
Not in the analog Spectra, anyway. I've got a UHF Spectra that slipped a bit (I have no clue how), but one day I read the codeplug the and scan list indicated 17 of 16 maximum. I can add as many channels as I want, and the radio will take it and scan them properly (does 40 quite nicely, with good response time.) It's only in the first zone, and I've never been able to reproduce the "failure", but it proves that there is no hardware limitation...
motorola_otaku
Posts: 1854
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:03 am

Post by motorola_otaku »

tvsjr wrote:and I've never been able to reproduce the "failure"...
Does that include labbing the codeplug into a "good" radio?
Post Reply

Return to “Legacy Batboard Motorola ASTRO (VSELP/IMBE/AMBE) Equipment Forum”