Scrambling?

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
bellersley
No Longer Registered
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 7:03 am

Scrambling?

Post by bellersley »

I'm looking at equiping a bunch of radios with some type of voice inversion scrambling. They are either going to be HT1000's or Kenwood TK-280's. Either radio type is available, I'm just wondering what my options are, and how much $$ I'm going to be looking at.

It's not for anything secret squirel, just for a customer who uses them in his fishing business, and he's getting tired of the competition listening in. They're on a private VHF channel, so no issues about the law.
User avatar
Pj
Moderator
Posts: 5147
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: X9000 thru APX

Post by Pj »

Transcypt would be my choice. They have all sorts of options from basic inversion to good stuff.
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
Image
User avatar
HLA
Posts: 2334
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:15 pm
What radios do you own?: HT1550's, X9000's, CDM1550's

Post by HLA »

i'd use transcrypt too and use ht1000's, they plug right into the acc socket in the radio with no soldering or alterations to the radio.
HLA
I never check PM's so don't bother, just email me.
I won't reply to a hotmail, gmail, aol or any other generic free address, if you want me to reply use a real address.
STOP ASKING ME FOR SOFTWARE OR FIRMWARE, I JUST FORWARD ALL OF THE REQUESTS TO THE MODERATORS
RKG
Posts: 2629
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by RKG »

Be careful about using one of these devices in connection with any system that uses receiver voting.
bellersley
No Longer Registered
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 7:03 am

Post by bellersley »

RKG wrote:Be careful about using one of these devices in connection with any system that uses receiver voting.
Nothing quite that fancy here. Just a couple of drunken fishermen.
User avatar
Pimpala03
Posts: 259
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:42 pm
What radios do you own?: M1225, HT100, P1225, etc

Post by Pimpala03 »

RKG wrote:Be careful about using one of these devices in connection with any system that uses receiver voting.
What's up with that? Pm me if you'd rather. I'm interested in what problems that causes.
In God we trust. Everyone else, we run through NCIC, Thinkstream, and III.
User avatar
alex
Administrator
Posts: 5762
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by alex »

Pimpala03 wrote:
RKG wrote:Be careful about using one of these devices in connection with any system that uses receiver voting.
What's up with that? Pm me if you'd rather. I'm interested in what problems that causes.
It's because voting works by comparing audio quality. Because it doesn't sound like voice, the voters may not vote the signal correctly.

I believe that's what RKG's point is.

-Alex
User avatar
Pimpala03
Posts: 259
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:42 pm
What radios do you own?: M1225, HT100, P1225, etc

Post by Pimpala03 »

Good to know. We have a voting receiver system here and all of our Jedi HTs also scramble.
In God we trust. Everyone else, we run through NCIC, Thinkstream, and III.
RKG
Posts: 2629
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by RKG »

Alex is on point; I actually forget all of the technical details, but a couple of years ago a department more or less on its own went out and bought a bunch of Midian boards without investigating how they would work with the voted system. All had to be removed, and when we got involved we concluded that if you really want encryption with a voted system, you had to go high end with a product from Motorola, designed to work with such systems.
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”