IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

This forum is dedicated to discussions pertaining specifically to the Motorola ASTRO line of radios (those that use VSELP/IMBE/AMBE), including using digital modulation, digital programming, FlashPort upgrades, etc. If you have general questions please use the General or Programming forums.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Renamon
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:00 pm

IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Renamon »

Listening to LAPD in analog & digital concurrently (2 radios at the same time, heh too much free time), sometimes you will hear something that sounds like a preamble, and other times you will not - all on the same channel, and it is all voice traffic on the IMBE decoded side. I cannot recreate this sound on simplex, even if I turn the preamble up to 255. So, is there a difference in how IMBE is handled in a SIMPLEX operation over a CONVENTIONAL REPEATER operation?
MattSR
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by MattSR »

Can you explain what the preamble sounds like?

is it a short high pitched tone?
User avatar
Wowbagger
Aeroflex
Posts: 1287
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:46 am

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Wowbagger »

On a repeater's voice channel, the sequence goes something like this:
System allocates voice channel.
Voice channel starts sending TERM WITH LC frames
System assigns radios to channel.
------
TX radio comes on voice channel, sends VOICE HEADER frame
Voice channel sends VOICE HEADER frame
TX radio starts sending LDU1/LDU2 frames (voice frames)
Voice channel sends LDU1/LDU2 frames
TX unkeys, sends TERM frames
------
Voice channel starts sending TERM WITH LC frames
After hang time, voice channel shuts down and is deallocated.

The bit between the lines happens on a simplex channel the bits outside the lines doesn't. It may be what you are hearing is the TERM WITH LC frames.
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.

I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.

I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
User avatar
Renamon
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Renamon »

That make sense, thank you. :D
MattSR
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by MattSR »

Wowbagger wrote:It may be what you are hearing is the TERM WITH LC frames.
At the start of a transmission on a conventional, non trunked channel...? That doesn't sound right... For trunking maybe but for conventional, naaah.... :)
User avatar
Wowbagger
Aeroflex
Posts: 1287
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:46 am

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Wowbagger »

MattSR wrote:
Wowbagger wrote:It may be what you are hearing is the TERM WITH LC frames.
At the start of a transmission on a conventional, non trunked channel...? That doesn't sound right... For trunking maybe but for conventional, naaah.... :)
He did say LAPD - IIRC they are running full APCO-25 trunking.
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.

I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.

I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
akardam
Posts: 2251
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 10:53 am

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by akardam »

Wowbagger wrote:He did say LAPD - IIRC they are running full APCO-25 trunking.
LAPD has been on "Astro" conventional for many years, first VSELP, and now P25 IMBE, but not trunking.
User avatar
Wowbagger
Aeroflex
Posts: 1287
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:46 am

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Wowbagger »

akardam wrote:
Wowbagger wrote:He did say LAPD - IIRC they are running full APCO-25 trunking.
LAPD has been on "Astro" conventional for many years, first VSELP, and now P25 IMBE, but not trunking.
So you are saying they don't have any control channels - they are running just a bit better than amateur radio repeaters?
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.

I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.

I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
User avatar
Renamon
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Renamon »

Wowbagger wrote:So you are saying they don't have any control channels - they are running just a bit better than amateur radio repeaters?
Yea, pretty much. They are not on IIRC - they are just running a mess of conventional P25 repeaters. They must have as many individual repeaters as IIRC has, lol.
User avatar
escomm
Queue Moderator
Posts: 5170
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:24 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by escomm »

Wowbagger wrote:
akardam wrote:
Wowbagger wrote:He did say LAPD - IIRC they are running full APCO-25 trunking.
LAPD has been on "Astro" conventional for many years, first VSELP, and now P25 IMBE, but not trunking.
So you are saying they don't have any control channels - they are running just a bit better than amateur radio repeaters?
No, amateur repeaters get tuned once in awhile. :lol:
motorola_otaku
Posts: 1854
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:03 am

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by motorola_otaku »

Renamon wrote:..sometimes you will hear something that sounds like a preamble, and other times you will not - all on the same channel, and it is all voice traffic on the IMBE decoded side.
Is what you're hearing a short little bit of digital data (brrrrrrp) followed by decoded voice? I've noticed that before but not on actual system radios - only on scanners. I chalked it up to "lol crummy scanner design" and didn't give it much thought after that.
User avatar
Renamon
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Renamon »

I am using an Astro Saber to moniter, and just an analog radio to hear the digital data itself, and i will hear sometimes something that sound like a preamble; it does not sound the same as the digital data for voice.

I will try to get a recording of it.
MattSR
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by MattSR »

Renamon wrote:....sound like a preamble; it does not sound the same as the digital data for voice..
I'm very curious. I know the P25 protocol very well, and what you are hearing could be one of a few things. If you can post a recording i'm sure we can figure it out :)
User avatar
Renamon
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Renamon »

Ok, here is the file...

http://simpleskye.com/p25.wav

There are 2 separate transmissions - both have the same "preamble", but both have different "post-ambles". I shortened the majority of the transmissions, so you didn't have to hear 30 seconds of p25 voice data.

-Jake
User avatar
Bill_G
Posts: 3087
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:00 am

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Bill_G »

I hear that on a regular scanner when monitoring a P25 system. I always thought it was a form of EOT.
MattSR
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by MattSR »

So is your question regarding the tail at the end, or the preamble (which is the same)

..........
User avatar
Renamon
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Renamon »

Originally, just the preamble. Now I am curious about the end as well. :D
MattSR
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by MattSR »

The long buzzy tail is a string of TDU without link control frames. These are short 15ms frames that tell the mobile radios that the voice traffic is over - Yes you only hear them on repeaters, and they're configured on the Quantar under the "Drop out delay" field. Apart from telling the mobiles the transmission is over, they also keep all radios in sync so when one wants to key up again, theres no delay.

As for the premable, well, that always sounds the same on all of the transmissions I've heard (including the ones given above) so i'm not sure what you're referring to here..?

Cheers,
Matt
User avatar
Bill_G
Posts: 3087
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:00 am

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by Bill_G »

So, the runt at the end of the data is an EOT.
MattSR
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: IMBE Simplex vs Repeater

Post by MattSR »

Yep.

The preamble is just the HDU packet. This is a header that contains the NAC, and some encryption sync information. This is the short "brrt" heard at the start of the overs.

Cheers,
Matt
Post Reply

Return to “Legacy Batboard Motorola ASTRO (VSELP/IMBE/AMBE) Equipment Forum”