Nominal Tx Power
Moderator: Queue Moderator
Nominal Tx Power
I know that all radios are different and must be tuned differently. But roughly for a 5W UHF (R or S split doesn't matter), what is the nominal power range (measured at a service monitor or wattmeter)? I'm assuming the nominal range is about 4.8W. I had almost all of my portables except for one tuned recently, and I measured the output of all 7 Tx Points and they each average about ~4.8W.
However, for the radio I did not have sent to the shop, when I measured the 7 Tx Points it has a measured power out of nearly 5.8W. I'm just wondering whats accepted as a nominal range for power tuning.
However, for the radio I did not have sent to the shop, when I measured the 7 Tx Points it has a measured power out of nearly 5.8W. I'm just wondering whats accepted as a nominal range for power tuning.
- Bryan
"So the best solution is to paint them to blue color and throw them to the sea?" in reference to MTS2000 F01/93.
"So the best solution is to paint them to blue color and throw them to the sea?" in reference to MTS2000 F01/93.
Re: Nominal Tx Power
What voltage are you testing at? Are you using a regulated power supply set to the proper voltage as indicated in the test procedures? or are you using a battery?
Testing using a battery can give you significantly different readings based on state of charge.
Testing using a battery can give you significantly different readings based on state of charge.
Re: Nominal Tx Power
When I was portable boy, back when MX300's and MT500's were current production, I balanced xmit power with current drain leaning towards min current rather than max power. On a high power portable (4-5W) if I could get within a watt of rated power at rated current, I sent it out. I rarely saw more than rated power at rated current.
Re: Nominal Tx Power
Regulated supply at 7.8V (these are portables).RFguy wrote:What voltage are you testing at? Are you using a regulated power supply set to the proper voltage as indicated in the test procedures? or are you using a battery?
Testing using a battery can give you significantly different readings based on state of charge.
Shouldn't batteries be avoided for tuning in almost all cases?
- Bryan
"So the best solution is to paint them to blue color and throw them to the sea?" in reference to MTS2000 F01/93.
"So the best solution is to paint them to blue color and throw them to the sea?" in reference to MTS2000 F01/93.
Re: Nominal Tx Power
The cable also makes a difference. To get rated power on out XTS5000s I use a short 12 in or so cable. If I use a normal 6ft test cable I loose a watt or so.
I had a Ham officer complaining about the loss on his gutter mount with low loss claimed cable. It was no surprise that the Teflon rg 174 style cable lost 3/4 th of the power at UHF.
He said but it says low loss on the package!
I had a Ham officer complaining about the loss on his gutter mount with low loss claimed cable. It was no surprise that the Teflon rg 174 style cable lost 3/4 th of the power at UHF.
He said but it says low loss on the package!
Re: Nominal Tx Power
I have a short 1ft LMR400 pigtail connected between the radio and test set.GlennD wrote:The cable also makes a difference. To get rated power on out XTS5000s I use a short 12 in or so cable.
- Bryan
"So the best solution is to paint them to blue color and throw them to the sea?" in reference to MTS2000 F01/93.
"So the best solution is to paint them to blue color and throw them to the sea?" in reference to MTS2000 F01/93.
Re: Nominal Tx Power
Portables should be tested at 7.50 Volts at the radio. A proper dummy battery or adapter is needed.gatekeep wrote:Regulated supply at 7.8V (these are portables).RFguy wrote:What voltage are you testing at? Are you using a regulated power supply set to the proper voltage as indicated in the test procedures? or are you using a battery?
Testing using a battery can give you significantly different readings based on state of charge.
Shouldn't batteries be avoided for tuning in almost all cases?
Yes, a battery should NOT be used for transmitter tests.
Re: Nominal Tx Power
The other issue that sticks it's nose into any measurement is just how good is the measuring divice used to get the RF output power? When was the last time it was calibrated?
When your in the 5 watt range, it doesn't take much of an error to move the measured power up or down. The cable being used and the connector at the radio all come into play here. The difference of 4.5 watts and 5.0 watts is not that much difference on the range the radio will have. Think your getting too picky on this power point. The current the radio pulls is much more important.
Jim
When your in the 5 watt range, it doesn't take much of an error to move the measured power up or down. The cable being used and the connector at the radio all come into play here. The difference of 4.5 watts and 5.0 watts is not that much difference on the range the radio will have. Think your getting too picky on this power point. The current the radio pulls is much more important.
Jim
Re: Nominal Tx Power
Even if perfectly calibrated, what is the uncertainty on the measurement? If you have a power meter rated to +/- 0.1dB accuracy, that is still 0.2 watts of uncertainty - and 0.1dB is lab grade gear.Jim202 wrote:The other issue that sticks it's nose into any measurement is just how good is the measuring divice used to get the RF output power? When was the last time it was calibrated?
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.