UHSO on Quantar for 12.5 kHz Operation

This forum is dedicated to discussions pertaining specifically to the Motorola ASTRO line of radios (those that use VSELP/IMBE/AMBE), including using digital modulation, digital programming, FlashPort upgrades, etc. If you have general questions please use the General or Programming forums.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
ASTROMODAT
Posts: 1825
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 12:32 am

UHSO on Quantar for 12.5 kHz Operation

Post by ASTROMODAT »

The current R3 catalog (Oct - Nov, 2002) states that the UHSO ($2,000 additional) on the UHF Conventional Quantar is necessary for 12.5 kHz P25 conventional operation.

Is this really necessary?

I'm a bit perplexed, as the ASTRO P & M are certainly not stable to 0.1 PPM.

Larry
User avatar
wavetar
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by wavetar »

The only time I've seen those UHSO's needed were in Simulcast systems. I don't see why it's "necessary" for 12.5KHz P25 operation...unless it's written somewhere within the P25 specs. If you have several repeaters at the same site, a Rubidium oscillator is even more accurate & cost effective, as you can input it to multiple repeaters.

Todd
ASTROMODAT
Posts: 1825
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 12:32 am

Post by ASTROMODAT »

The UHSO also includes an ouput to support up to 8 or more additional Quantars. (Does me no good, as I will only have the one Quantar.)

The R3 says the UHSO is required for simulcasting systems, and also for 12.5 kHz operation.

I suppose one can second guess'em, but in the end, I'd hate to have a problem by trying to save on bagging this one option. Just that it's pricey and you don't get any features out of it.
User avatar
ASTRO_25
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 360
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by ASTRO_25 »

Ok, for us guys that are somewhat literate, but not totally, can you explain what UHSO means?

My guess is "Uniform Something Simulcast Operation" ??

:D
Yummy.... bacon and eggs.
User avatar
jcobb
Posts: 1914
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by jcobb »

How about "Ultra High Stability Option".

What it seems to me.

Jack
****************************************

****************************************
User avatar
wavetar
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by wavetar »

jcobb wrote:How about "Ultra High Stability Option".

What it seems to me.

Jack
So close. Ultra High Stability Oscillator.
User avatar
jcobb
Posts: 1914
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by jcobb »

I knew I needed to clean my glasses! :o

Jack[/i]
****************************************

****************************************
User avatar
xmo
Moderator
Posts: 2549
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by xmo »

Here is what the Quantar planner has to say:

"INTERNAL UHSO (X873) = Equips the station with an internal high stability oscillator that fits within the cardcage. Used to provide 0.1 PPM frequency stability for FCC compliance on 900 MHz stations or for 12.5kHz narrowband applications on UHF and 800MHz stations. Not recommended for simulcast applications..."
ASTROMODAT
Posts: 1825
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 12:32 am

Post by ASTROMODAT »

Xmo, based on your quopte from the system planner, it IS NECESSARY for 12.5 kHz ops at UHF, unless you have an equivalent external means to provide 0.1 PPM stability (which would likely cost 2-grand anyways).

Thanks, now at least I don't feel quite so bad about having to buy it (since it really is necessary).
Larry
User avatar
xmo
Moderator
Posts: 2549
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by xmo »

"Thanks, now at least I don't feel quite so bad about having to buy it (since it really is necessary). "

Maybe it isn't really necessary.

The Quantar Product Planner has a frequency stability table (on pg. 25) that lists the stability for various bands. The basic stability on UHF is 1 PPM. The table lists 0.1 PPM as being necessary for UHF 12.5 kHz analog operation, but there is a ** footnote in the table that says:

"** NOTE: Under certain conditions a Frequency Stability of 1 PPM may be adequate."

Before spending the money for that option be sure of the FCC requirements for YOUR license.
ASTROMODAT
Posts: 1825
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 12:32 am

Post by ASTROMODAT »

Let's assume that the FCC is O.K. w/ the 0.1 PPM.

Is there any good engineering reason for the 0.1 PPM stability for IMBE ops at 12.5 kHz channnel spacing? (I sure wouldn't mind saving the 2 Grand!)

Larry
Post Reply

Return to “Legacy Batboard Motorola ASTRO (VSELP/IMBE/AMBE) Equipment Forum”