FCC makes list of towers they think should be registered...

Jonathan KC8RYW · Post by **Jonathan KC8RYW** » Fri Sep 05, 2003 4:34 pm

I got this off the broadcast.net listserv. It's worth a look.

The FCC has released a list of towers that they feel should be registered, and they are not.

The list is at http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/release ... stered.pdf

The rest of the story is at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a ... 2411A1.pdf

It might be worth your time to check to see if any of your towers are on the list. Or someone you don't care for !

KG6EAQ · Post by **KG6EAQ** » Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:41 pm

Not nearly as many sites as I would've expected in California. Interesting how many are down in PR.

nmfire10 · Post by **nmfire10** » Sat Sep 06, 2003 4:33 am

Oh good, we're not on their $hit list.

Tom in D.C. · Post by **Tom in D.C.** » Sat Sep 06, 2003 10:11 am

This subject is still probably governed by the CFR, extracts of which used to be published in an FCC booklet titled "Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace." The way I remember it you either fell within the regs (meaning lights on the tower) or you didn't fall within the regs (which obviously meant no lights).

wa2zdy · Post by **wa2zdy** » Sat Sep 06, 2003 12:59 pm

Wow, only two in NJ. I didn't think folks here were so compliant with rules. Cool. heh heh heh

FCC makes list of towers they think should be registered...

FCC makes list of towers they think should be registered...

Antenna towers...