grounding and site installation questions... L O N G
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2004 7:30 pm
cross-posting my ramblings from tower-pro and repeater-builder groups...
I have a unique site that I need some help figuring out exactly how to handle a unique site installation.
Reading through both volumes of the R56 site standards books… I have yet to find anything that talks about “abnormal” site installations.
Here’s the background.
One BIG bridge. Four concrete pillars. Roadway is approximately 200 feet above the water. Pillar height above the road is 460 feet about 660 feet AMSL). Equipment access point is 100 feet below the top of the pillar (about 560 feet above the water). This is where the equipment MUST be installed. No option of placing it at the roadway due to some contractual limitations. Access to the site is pretty severely limited due to the traffic, coast guard, police, etc. This is truly one of the best sites still available at no cost very high great vantage of the city free, and a minimal hardline run (<100ft) did I mention free?
Besides the fact that the equipment has to be man-handled up to the access point (been there, done that before cargo net and a bunch of fat guys can work wonders…) there is a problem with power and grounding.
The power in the access room is tapped from the bridge lighting system it’s entirely adequate for our requirements (about 16 amps absolute max) but I am unsure of what the best way to protect the equipment from transients would be. In the past, and in my experience, a simple transtector (or similar MOV/SAD device) was entirely adequate for a site installation (think typical, properly outfitted radio site). However, there is NOTHING on the bridge AC system to my knowledge that provides even a little protection to the power circuits on the bridge.
Let me tell you that the equipment being installed is a Motorola Quantar repeater not your run of the mill micor or MSF. Both of those (and other) legacy gear have massive ferro-resonant power supplies that can withstand a lot more abuse than the switching power supply in the Quantar. Since this Quantar is mine (and not some billion-dollar conglomerate) I would like to provide “well above average” power filtering for it. I am debating some kind of APC UPS or something for the repeater. I know I’ll hear volumes about that but I definitely want something that will prevent “sags” in the AC power as well as the ability to clamp anything that gets past the old reliable Transtector. The idea here is to plug an APC/UPS into the transtector…. Hopefully providing a little better protection for the repeater. No, I am NOT hauling 4 deep cycle marine batteries up 460 feet to the access point.
Ok, on to question #2…. Grounding. Or lack thereof. The only grounding (besides the AC power system) is the lightning rods at the top of the pillar. Besides the fact that there is no way to ground the Quantar cabinet… The big question here is grounding the hardline. In all the installs I have been a part of in the last few years, the hardline outer shell was grounded at the TOP and BOTTOM of the tower to the tower. I have no luxury of this at this bridge. Discussing this with a local Moto technician who installed a federal gov’t repeater on one of the other pillars at this site revealed that the tower crew grounded the hardline TO THE LIGHTNING RODS at the top of the pillar. Don’t think 10 foot rods here… more like “rooftop” 1-2 foot rods… With the antennas mounted to the railing (yes, it’s sturdy gavalized pipe sunk into the concrete). The hardline on the other repeater is also grounded at the bottom of the pillar near the government repeater (don’t know where though). I need some opinions here. Should I even ground the hardline at all? My concern is that the antenna (direct grounded) will need a proper ground path to shunt any (!) strikes to “ground” no ground = nowhere for the energy to go (except blow apart the antenna)… trust me I am NOT a big proponent of tying the hardline to the lightning rods.
Anyway, if anyone out there has “been there done that” I’d love to hear your thoughts and opinions.
If you made it this far - thanks for the read - i am also looking for what motorola calls a "modular rack" or "T-rack" - basically an open 19" rack that has a pedestal at the bottom. No way i am pulling a full size quantar cabinet up to the top of the pillars... not to mention - it probably wouldn't fit through the access door....if you have one of these and you're in the southeast (florida, georgia, alabama, carolinas, etc) - please contact me ASAP.
Doug
I have a unique site that I need some help figuring out exactly how to handle a unique site installation.
Reading through both volumes of the R56 site standards books… I have yet to find anything that talks about “abnormal” site installations.
Here’s the background.
One BIG bridge. Four concrete pillars. Roadway is approximately 200 feet above the water. Pillar height above the road is 460 feet about 660 feet AMSL). Equipment access point is 100 feet below the top of the pillar (about 560 feet above the water). This is where the equipment MUST be installed. No option of placing it at the roadway due to some contractual limitations. Access to the site is pretty severely limited due to the traffic, coast guard, police, etc. This is truly one of the best sites still available at no cost very high great vantage of the city free, and a minimal hardline run (<100ft) did I mention free?
Besides the fact that the equipment has to be man-handled up to the access point (been there, done that before cargo net and a bunch of fat guys can work wonders…) there is a problem with power and grounding.
The power in the access room is tapped from the bridge lighting system it’s entirely adequate for our requirements (about 16 amps absolute max) but I am unsure of what the best way to protect the equipment from transients would be. In the past, and in my experience, a simple transtector (or similar MOV/SAD device) was entirely adequate for a site installation (think typical, properly outfitted radio site). However, there is NOTHING on the bridge AC system to my knowledge that provides even a little protection to the power circuits on the bridge.
Let me tell you that the equipment being installed is a Motorola Quantar repeater not your run of the mill micor or MSF. Both of those (and other) legacy gear have massive ferro-resonant power supplies that can withstand a lot more abuse than the switching power supply in the Quantar. Since this Quantar is mine (and not some billion-dollar conglomerate) I would like to provide “well above average” power filtering for it. I am debating some kind of APC UPS or something for the repeater. I know I’ll hear volumes about that but I definitely want something that will prevent “sags” in the AC power as well as the ability to clamp anything that gets past the old reliable Transtector. The idea here is to plug an APC/UPS into the transtector…. Hopefully providing a little better protection for the repeater. No, I am NOT hauling 4 deep cycle marine batteries up 460 feet to the access point.
Ok, on to question #2…. Grounding. Or lack thereof. The only grounding (besides the AC power system) is the lightning rods at the top of the pillar. Besides the fact that there is no way to ground the Quantar cabinet… The big question here is grounding the hardline. In all the installs I have been a part of in the last few years, the hardline outer shell was grounded at the TOP and BOTTOM of the tower to the tower. I have no luxury of this at this bridge. Discussing this with a local Moto technician who installed a federal gov’t repeater on one of the other pillars at this site revealed that the tower crew grounded the hardline TO THE LIGHTNING RODS at the top of the pillar. Don’t think 10 foot rods here… more like “rooftop” 1-2 foot rods… With the antennas mounted to the railing (yes, it’s sturdy gavalized pipe sunk into the concrete). The hardline on the other repeater is also grounded at the bottom of the pillar near the government repeater (don’t know where though). I need some opinions here. Should I even ground the hardline at all? My concern is that the antenna (direct grounded) will need a proper ground path to shunt any (!) strikes to “ground” no ground = nowhere for the energy to go (except blow apart the antenna)… trust me I am NOT a big proponent of tying the hardline to the lightning rods.
Anyway, if anyone out there has “been there done that” I’d love to hear your thoughts and opinions.
If you made it this far - thanks for the read - i am also looking for what motorola calls a "modular rack" or "T-rack" - basically an open 19" rack that has a pedestal at the bottom. No way i am pulling a full size quantar cabinet up to the top of the pillars... not to mention - it probably wouldn't fit through the access door....if you have one of these and you're in the southeast (florida, georgia, alabama, carolinas, etc) - please contact me ASAP.
Doug