Narrowband? Interoperability? VHF, UHF, 800?
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:56 pm
This is not necessarily Motorola specific; however the backbone 800MHz is a Motorola Type II SmartZone system. It also primarily pertains to VHF-HI but it could include UHF as well.
That said…..
In 2013 everyone in VHF-Hi and UHF will be narrowband. For the FD I'm a member of, this will mean acquiring about 40 radios (mobiles + portables). At present, the state I'm in (NC) is in the process of constructing a statewide 800 MHz system.
Since the state is in the process of completing the 800 MHz system (it's called VIPER), would our best option be to not buy any more VHF equipment and save up for the 800MHz system? Cost of 40 radios ~ $1,500.00 * 40 = $60,000.00 (minimum), or should we continue to buy VHF radios (narrowband capable) at a cost of $750.00 * 40 = $30,000.00 (maximum)?
I have never used a trunked system and I know on paper it really looks good, however I have used our conventional VHF system and it may not have many bells and whistles; but it works 24-7-365 no matter the conditions, especially simplex.
I hope the state has made all necessary provisions, for a fail safe system, but if a hurricane came through, and happen to knock out a couple of towers, would the trunked system work? The state has already said that paging will continue to be separate from the 800MHz system, so I assume the county will still maintain the current paging system (although converted to narrowband). If a few FD’s remain on VHF-Hi, and we totally switched to 800MHz, what would happen on mutual aid calls? Will the communications-center have a patch to link us together? Will we have gone from interoperable to un-interoperable?
It’s seems like the state and federal government is spending millions, and millions on new radio systems, and I agree that they can do a lot more than with conventional systems, but do totally volunteer fire departments really need to spend thousands and thousands of dollars on radios? I can see how a larger city such as Charlotte can justify the expense, but a rural department that answers less than 100 fires a year justify it?
If we had all narrowband equipment right now, I seriously doubt that we would migrate to 800MHz for several years, if at all. I know we are not the only volunteer FD in the country that is facing a narrowband mandate and has other possibilities as well.
I’m not being critical of the state’s 800MHz system, it just seems like converting to 800MHz is overboard for our needs. What would you do?
Please help!
That said…..
In 2013 everyone in VHF-Hi and UHF will be narrowband. For the FD I'm a member of, this will mean acquiring about 40 radios (mobiles + portables). At present, the state I'm in (NC) is in the process of constructing a statewide 800 MHz system.
Since the state is in the process of completing the 800 MHz system (it's called VIPER), would our best option be to not buy any more VHF equipment and save up for the 800MHz system? Cost of 40 radios ~ $1,500.00 * 40 = $60,000.00 (minimum), or should we continue to buy VHF radios (narrowband capable) at a cost of $750.00 * 40 = $30,000.00 (maximum)?
I have never used a trunked system and I know on paper it really looks good, however I have used our conventional VHF system and it may not have many bells and whistles; but it works 24-7-365 no matter the conditions, especially simplex.
I hope the state has made all necessary provisions, for a fail safe system, but if a hurricane came through, and happen to knock out a couple of towers, would the trunked system work? The state has already said that paging will continue to be separate from the 800MHz system, so I assume the county will still maintain the current paging system (although converted to narrowband). If a few FD’s remain on VHF-Hi, and we totally switched to 800MHz, what would happen on mutual aid calls? Will the communications-center have a patch to link us together? Will we have gone from interoperable to un-interoperable?
It’s seems like the state and federal government is spending millions, and millions on new radio systems, and I agree that they can do a lot more than with conventional systems, but do totally volunteer fire departments really need to spend thousands and thousands of dollars on radios? I can see how a larger city such as Charlotte can justify the expense, but a rural department that answers less than 100 fires a year justify it?
If we had all narrowband equipment right now, I seriously doubt that we would migrate to 800MHz for several years, if at all. I know we are not the only volunteer FD in the country that is facing a narrowband mandate and has other possibilities as well.
I’m not being critical of the state’s 800MHz system, it just seems like converting to 800MHz is overboard for our needs. What would you do?
Please help!