XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
Moderator: Queue Moderator
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
Hi all!
Anybody has noticed that PL/DLP SQL on XTS3000 a little bit (not fatally!) rough?
I’ll try to explain.
I have few conventional personalities programmed with PL (or DPL) on RX. And when repeater signal get very weak (appreciable noises under voice signal, but voice still recognizable; distance from antenna farm approx. 15 miles), XTS3000 begins flapping (very quickly opens and closes receiver - up to 3..4 flaps due the 2 seconds).
Turning On of the Monitor function (PL Disable) makes reception more stable - flaps quantity decreases to 1..2 due the 5 seconds. And listening becomes more pleasant (because listening a continuous signal more comfortable, than a signal with flaps).
More info: UHF band, ¼ whip antenna, repeater is Motorola Quantar. No simulcast. Radio is immovable in this test.
Personalities programmed as:
Mute/Unmute type = Standard
RX Voice/Signal type = Mixed Mode
RX Unmute Delay = 2 (100)
Squelch (Fine Tune) = 1
I tried to change Mute/Unmute type, RX Unmute Delay and Squelch (Fine Tune) to many different combinations, but no luck.
I have compared XTS3000 reception on MTS2000 and it have a less flaps than XTS3000.
Sensitivity of MTS2000 and XTS3000 with opened SQL (PL Disabled) appears to be an equal or even XTS3000 a little bit sensitive.
But MTS2000 (without PL Disabled option) decodes weak signal with PL (holds opened receiver) a little bit confidently.
This is normally or may be alignment/firmware issue?
There is legit radio and must have factory alignment. I checked softpots in tuner and they appears as NOT default (like is in Chinese radios).
Any well-considered comments will be appreciated!
P.S.
Radio FW 07.04.00.00, Host N07.03.16.
Anybody has noticed that PL/DLP SQL on XTS3000 a little bit (not fatally!) rough?
I’ll try to explain.
I have few conventional personalities programmed with PL (or DPL) on RX. And when repeater signal get very weak (appreciable noises under voice signal, but voice still recognizable; distance from antenna farm approx. 15 miles), XTS3000 begins flapping (very quickly opens and closes receiver - up to 3..4 flaps due the 2 seconds).
Turning On of the Monitor function (PL Disable) makes reception more stable - flaps quantity decreases to 1..2 due the 5 seconds. And listening becomes more pleasant (because listening a continuous signal more comfortable, than a signal with flaps).
More info: UHF band, ¼ whip antenna, repeater is Motorola Quantar. No simulcast. Radio is immovable in this test.
Personalities programmed as:
Mute/Unmute type = Standard
RX Voice/Signal type = Mixed Mode
RX Unmute Delay = 2 (100)
Squelch (Fine Tune) = 1
I tried to change Mute/Unmute type, RX Unmute Delay and Squelch (Fine Tune) to many different combinations, but no luck.
I have compared XTS3000 reception on MTS2000 and it have a less flaps than XTS3000.
Sensitivity of MTS2000 and XTS3000 with opened SQL (PL Disabled) appears to be an equal or even XTS3000 a little bit sensitive.
But MTS2000 (without PL Disabled option) decodes weak signal with PL (holds opened receiver) a little bit confidently.
This is normally or may be alignment/firmware issue?
There is legit radio and must have factory alignment. I checked softpots in tuner and they appears as NOT default (like is in Chinese radios).
Any well-considered comments will be appreciated!
P.S.
Radio FW 07.04.00.00, Host N07.03.16.
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
I would try changing the mute/unmute to "and/or", as well change the RX Unmute Delay to "0". This should help...if it doesn't, you may need the squelch level adjusted with the Tuner software, beyond what the 'fine tune' can do with the CPS.
No trees were harmed in the posting of this message...however an extraordinarily large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
Welcome to the /\/\achine.
Welcome to the /\/\achine.
- sethcwilliams
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 3:25 am
- What radios do you own?: Moto, Harris, GD, Raytheon
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
Agreed, but I do have a question. Wouldn't the "and/or" setting make the squelch gate more descriminitory, not less? Forcing two criteria to be required for the gate to open, but closing squelch on the loss of either. Seems like with his situation, being at the weak signal fringe, you'd want to leave squelch open as long as possible to allow the rough but intelligible audio through. Just thinking out loud, but no doubt you've got a lot more experience with Moto than I do so I'd yeild to your better judgement. Thanks man!wavetar wrote:I would try changing the mute/unmute to "and/or", as well change the RX Unmute Delay to "0". This should help...if it doesn't, you may need the squelch level adjusted with the Tuner software, beyond what the 'fine tune' can do with the CPS.
// EDIT 22MAY2009 1614Z // This is all assuming MotoFan doesn't operate in an overly saturated EME and doesn't share close channel assignment with his neighbors. // EDIT 22MAY2009 1614Z //
Semper Fi,
BONZ
Not a Motorola Guy, but I play one throughout the week....
BONZ
Not a Motorola Guy, but I play one throughout the week....
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
Thank you for reply!
I hope that problem in PL/DLP decoder sensitivity.
I know from theory that PL decoder required better SNR (Signal Noise Ratio) than carrier decoder. And that DPL decoder required better SNR than PL decoder. And it’s perfectly clear why.
But I want to know why fresher XTS3000 needs greater SNR than older MTS2000 to decode PL/DPL?
P.S.
Any settings in Astro Tuner which affects on PL/DPL decoder perfomance?
As I remember, I already tried all combinations. And no any audible changes. But I will check again to be absolutely sure and let you know here.wavetar wrote:I would try changing the mute/unmute to "and/or", as well change the RX Unmute Delay to "0".
I hope that problem not in CSQ settings ("Fine Tune" in regular CPS and "Master Squelch Value"). Just because carrier squelch (CSQ) works correctly. It follows from my experiment with "PL Disable" (this option disables sub-tone decoder and makes active carrier decoder only).This should help...if it doesn't, you may need the squelch level adjusted with the Tuner software, beyond what the 'fine tune' can do with the CPS.
I hope that problem in PL/DLP decoder sensitivity.
I know from theory that PL decoder required better SNR (Signal Noise Ratio) than carrier decoder. And that DPL decoder required better SNR than PL decoder. And it’s perfectly clear why.
But I want to know why fresher XTS3000 needs greater SNR than older MTS2000 to decode PL/DPL?
P.S.
Any settings in Astro Tuner which affects on PL/DPL decoder perfomance?
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
- Josh
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: APX4K, XTL5K, NX5200, NX700HK
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
I had similar issues on an XTS3000 as well.
I set the squelch type to "STANDARD" and that did the trick, it then functioned properly in the fringes. I also set the squelch fine tune lower as well.
AND/OR and the other options are more discriminatory than STANDARD in that standard allows for loss of the PL for short amounts of time without muting the speaker for times when the signal starts to chop up.
-Josh
I set the squelch type to "STANDARD" and that did the trick, it then functioned properly in the fringes. I also set the squelch fine tune lower as well.
AND/OR and the other options are more discriminatory than STANDARD in that standard allows for loss of the PL for short amounts of time without muting the speaker for times when the signal starts to chop up.
-Josh
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
No. It does NOT help. The same clappy reception :(wavetar wrote:I would try changing the mute/unmute to "and/or", as well change the RX Unmute Delay to "0". This should help...
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
When Mute/Unmute Type = "Standard", "Squelch (Fine tune)" value actually does NOT used by receiver (just because carrier detector turned off).Josh wrote:I set the squelch type to "STANDARD" and that did the trick, it then functioned properly in the fringes. I also set the squelch fine tune lower as well.
You can set it to 15 (maximum value) and try - you still be able to receive all weak signals with proper PL/DPL.
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
I tried another XTS3000 (from the same agency) and it works absolutely identically to described above radio.
Maybe any changes in PL/DPL decoder have been made in fresher firmware/DSP?
Latest FW is R07.71.06 and DSP R08.03.05.
Tested radios have FW 07.04.00.00 and DSP N07.03.16.
Maybe any changes in PL/DPL decoder have been made in fresher firmware/DSP?
Latest FW is R07.71.06 and DSP R08.03.05.
Tested radios have FW 07.04.00.00 and DSP N07.03.16.
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
- Josh
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: APX4K, XTL5K, NX5200, NX700HK
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
This was done with changing the radio squelch requirements to "standard" on one? You won't notice change unless it is.MotoFAN wrote:I tried another XTS3000 (from the same agency) and it works absolutely identically to described above radio.
Maybe any changes in PL/DPL decoder have been made in fresher firmware/DSP?
Latest FW is R07.71.06 and DSP R08.03.05.
Tested radios have FW 07.04.00.00 and DSP N07.03.16.
My XTS3k is Host/DSP 7 as well, so it's not the age of the firmware.
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
Is your quantar transmitting PL or DPL?
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system


- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
Yes. I test radios on two different channels. On the first channel Quantar transmits PL and on the second channel Quantar transmits DPL.Pj wrote:Is your quantar transmitting PL or DPL?
P.S.
Do you have XTS3000 in your collection? I have compared today XTS3000 with MTS2000 and few Vertex radios, and only XTS3000 'claps' on these repeaters :(
Last edited by MotoFAN on Sun May 24, 2009 10:55 pm, edited 3 times in total.
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
Yes, I have reprogrammed second radio to the same settings. And also tried "Standard". No luck :(Josh wrote:This was done with changing the radio squelch requirements to "standard" on one? You won't notice change unless it is.
My XTS3k is Host/DSP 7 as well, so it's not the age of the firmware.
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
I upgraded my radios to current Host/DPS, but no positive changes 

I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
- Josh
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: APX4K, XTL5K, NX5200, NX700HK
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
MotoFAN wrote:I upgraded my radios to current Host/DPS, but no positive changes
How about the squelch settings? Have you tried lowering them?
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: XTS3000 PL/DLP Squelch sensitivity
Of course, problem isn't here.Josh wrote:How about the squelch settings? Have you tried lowering them?
And please re-read this message: http://batboard.batlabs.com/viewtopic.p ... 35#p380883
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.