Motorola and portable radio antenna connectors

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Cam
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 786
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 2:59 pm

Motorola and portable radio antenna connectors

Post by Cam »

What is the deal?
Is there some logical reason that I just don't see why Motorola can't use the same connector on their whole line of portables? We have a wide range of portables in use or that have been replaced and are now sitting. We when from UHF HT600's and MT1000's to HT1000's, MT2000's and MTS2000's and now have HT750's and HT1250's in the mix. We at one time piggy backed on a 800mhz LTR system for project and used MTX8000's and Waris MTX's loaded to us by the system owner.

Based on this and radio's that I have owned myself, i fail to see what the reasoning is with the connectors. It's not like they came up with a great new design and started using that for everything. They seem to switch back and forth. Even the Waris line uses different connectors in the same line.

Can anybody clue me in on this.
ai4ui
was kf4pxz
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:07 pm

Re: Motorola and portable radio antenna connectors

Post by ai4ui »

Just a guess but personal preference of the head of the design team? Doesn't make much sense. I like the SMA ones because you can get a proper connector for it instead of an adapter that has no real ground connection.
Wyrd bið ful ãræd, Fate is inexorable...
User avatar
Cam
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 786
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 2:59 pm

Re: Motorola and portable radio antenna connectors

Post by Cam »

ai4ui wrote:Just a guess but personal preference of the head of the design team? Doesn't make much sense. I like the SMA ones because you can get a proper connector for it instead of an adapter that has no real ground connection.
I had that idea as well but who knows.

Kind of on the same subject; I have two UHF 1/4 waves here in my hand. One is for an HT1000 and one for our HT1250's. Both say they are the for the same band split but the HT1000 antenna (sma) is about an inch shorter. Most be the power of the little ball on top. :lol:
User avatar
d119
Posts: 3538
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 4:00 pm

Re: Motorola and portable radio antenna connectors

Post by d119 »

My guess would be cost.

Loss factors at UHF and above are considerably higher than that of VHF.

If you look at most VHF radios, they just have a threaded nut connector. 800/900 units ALWAYS have the RP-SMA connectors on them.

My 220MHz HT1250 has an RP-SMA connector on it.

The Jedi series radios probably received those connectors because of the tier of radio they are - high end, public safety.
Last edited by d119 on Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bill_G
Posts: 3087
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:00 am

Re: Motorola and portable radio antenna connectors

Post by Bill_G »

Somehow our guys never have any problem swapping antennas between models. But, I think some of them could screw a popsicle stick in without any trouble.
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”