Awesomely powerful signals...what is the Coast Guard using?

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Elroy Jetson
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Awesomely powerful signals...what is the Coast Guard using?

Post by Elroy Jetson »

I live in Central Florida, on the east coast, about 20 miles south of Port Canaveral.

My VHF radios have marine channel 16 in the scan list. Sometimes I hear
something interesting enough to be worthwhile.

I've got to wonder just what sort of transmitters the Coast Guard uses.
I've heard both the Jacksonville and Miami Coast Guard stations get
on the channel and practically blow me out of my chair. 200, maybe 300
mile signal paths, and they're at full quieting on ANY receiver I have, and
practically heating up my receiver antenna.

Whatever they're running, it's insane. And I want to know what it is.

Power, antenna type and gain, altitude, ERP, and radiation pattern.

Does anyone know what they're running to be able to virtually blanket
half the state with a single transmitter? It must be something really
extraordinary.


Elroy
User avatar
Bruce1807
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:18 am

Post by Bruce1807 »

http://www.gdc4s.com/content/detail.cfm ... 0e9f7972fa

should answer your question.
It's not a single site, its a network
User avatar
Tom in D.C.
Posts: 3859
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Progreso soup can with CRT

USCG Radio...

Post by Tom in D.C. »

Elroy,

CG radio sounded like you describe the current ch.16 when
they were on HF years ago, 2182 kHz AM if I remember right.
When a call was heard the coast stations would all call back
in turn, trying to get a response. I was in NYC and would
hear CG at Groton, New London, Nantucket, etc. all calling.
Lots of good radio discipline and a signal that was so strong
you could hear the hum in their power supplies.

Regards,
Tom in D.C.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
WB6NVH
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:08 pm

Post by WB6NVH »

The Coast Guard recently published a request for public comments related to their interest in shutting down all HF radio operations including SITOR, weather fax, and so forth, citing maintenance issues on the equipment, lack of spare parts, and so forth.
User avatar
Bruce1807
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:18 am

Post by Bruce1807 »

with stat comms who can blame them when the cg is just an iridium or an inmarsat call away.
User avatar
batdude
Personal aide to Mr. Cook
Posts: 2741
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2001 4:00 pm

..

Post by batdude »

last time i was at the port ops office at the pcan coast guard office...


they had a 50w spectra on a 100ish foot tower...

that's it - nothing more, nothing less...




d
BRAVO MIKE JULIET ALPHA
"You can do whatever you want, there are just consequences..."
IF SOMEONE PM'S YOU - HAVE THE COURTESY TO REPLY.
User avatar
Elroy Jetson
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Elroy Jetson »

Canaveral's signal is vastly overmodulated but not particularly powerful.


Jacksonville heats up my antenna!

Miami is almost as strong. And those are two LONG hauls.



Elroy
User avatar
Pj
Moderator
Posts: 5147
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: X9000 thru APX

Post by Pj »

Most of the installs that I have seen in CT where 50watt W9 Astro Spectra's.

There was a shot of the CG station at Dutch Harbor in the Deadlist Catch not too long ago which also showed a W9 Astro Spectra in a console. Didn't see what the display said though..

Mush be a nice LOS with the flatland of FL.
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
Image
User avatar
Elroy Jetson
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Elroy Jetson »

I think that they USED to run 300 watt Motorola base stations (rack mounted) but I can't remember what model they were. And I'm sure they're long
gone as they seemed to be of early 70s vintage.


But even 300 watts from an 1800 foot tower might not be enough to
account for the monster signals I've heard from them.

They probably are NOT using multiple transmitters in different locations
as that would cause multipath issues, and there are none that I can determine. No fluttering as I'm in motion, or stationary, or anything
else that might indicate multiple transmitters on the same frequency.



Elroy
Hartley
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

USCG

Post by Hartley »

Hi Y'all,

All the new "Rescue 21" CG stuff is Quantar - while the older radios were a hodgepodge, depending on where you are. Out west, it is/was mostly Mastr II, while the eastern stuff has been reported as both Motorola (Mitrek bases thru Astro Spectra) and GE. But the new stuff is all supposed to be Quantar. All the linking is digital, instead of the older leased lines - most of the over/under modulation and distortion problems were related to those lines, not the equipment itself.

73 DE Hartley
User avatar
Deputy Disaster
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:42 pm

Post by Deputy Disaster »

They have tons of remote sites. They could be 200 miles away from the transmitter you are listening to.
User avatar
d119
Posts: 3532
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by d119 »

Elroy Jetson wrote:They probably are NOT using multiple transmitters in different locations
as that would cause multipath issues, and there are none that I can determine. No fluttering as I'm in motion, or stationary, or anything
else that might indicate multiple transmitters on the same frequency.
Elroy

Unless it was a good, properly phased simulcast, which if that was the case, you'd never know there were multiple transmitters.
User avatar
Bruce1807
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:18 am

Post by Bruce1807 »

could also be voting with transmitter steering
RKG
Posts: 2629
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by RKG »

In this neck of the woods, the radios themselves are nothing spectacular: largely (to my observation) a mix of mid- and high-power Spectras and one MSF5000. However, they have some good high sites (Pilgrim Monument: 343 MSL in Provincetown, and Newport-Jamestown Bridge superstructure, for examples) which are connected by TRC and phone lines. Receivers are voted; transmitters are operator steered. Limited (possibly inadvertent) simulcasting.
User avatar
MSS-Dave
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 6:02 pm
What radios do you own?: XTL5K, NX300, PD782, Spark Gap

Post by MSS-Dave »

Last time I serviced it in 2000 or so..

USCG TX in Flagler Beach, FL used a multi channel 100 watt Micor base with a dedicated monitor RX on channel 16. This could be operated by tone remote from Jacksonville, Cape Canaveral and several other sites. I think it has been upgraded since then to a Quantar. Antenna was a DB 224 at 250 feet with all the elements directed offshore.

Dave
User avatar
nmfire10
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 4109
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 4:41 pm

Post by nmfire10 »

Lets also keep in mind that line-of-sight on the coastline and over the water is very uninhibited. There is no terrain or obstructions to get in the way. So if you put your 100 watt transmitter on a 6 or 10db gain antenna 180ft up in the air on the coast, it is going to go pretty far.
"I'll eat you like a plate of bacon and eggs in the morning. "
- Some loser on rr.com

eBay at it's finest:
Me: "What exactly is a 900Mhz UHF CB?"
Them: "A very nice CB at 900Mhz speed!"

:-?
User avatar
Elroy Jetson
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Elroy Jetson »

These monster signals are often noted quite a few miles inland. If I'm just picking up the backside of the radiation pattern, it makes the setup even more awesome still.



Elroy
User avatar
wavetar
Administrator
Posts: 7340
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by wavetar »

I know here in Atlantic Canada they are switching out all their current base stations (whatever they may be) with 100W MTR2000s. They have their own techs, so information is limited, but I know it's some sort of linked system. Total number of base stations east of Montreal number in the 500 range.

Todd
No trees were harmed in the posting of this message...however an extraordinarily large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

Welcome to the /\/\achine.
User avatar
Bruce1807
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:18 am

Post by Bruce1807 »

the speculation in this is driving me mad so lets state the information sofar.

They have quantars maybe 350 watt and MTR2000 at 100 watts.
They have many linked sites through a system called Rescue 21(link above)
They have high towers
They have high gain antennas mainly pointed at sea.

Now they are PS so sites probably overlap for redundency.
Okay put this together and you have a high power VHF system with great coverage along the coast.
Now any one in a coastal area should recieve the CG strong.Remember they are a PS as well as defence.
But as the system is multi site, they could be in Key West or New England.
or depending on the config they could be in Seattle and boom in like there next door in West Palm.

I mean in the end I have a 9db antenna at 260 ft with a MTR200 pushing 100 watts through 7/8 heliax.
Our centre can recieve 25 watt boats 80 miles away without a problem.
gws
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 5:06 am

Post by gws »

nmfire10 wrote:Lets also keep in mind that line-of-sight on the coastline and over the water is very uninhibited. There is no terrain or obstructions to get in the way. So if you put your 100 watt transmitter on a 6 or 10db gain antenna 180ft up in the air on the coast, it is going to go pretty far.
True Line of sight signals dont care power power levels once you have enough to overcome signal loss. a base antenna at 200ft talking to a ship with an antenna at 30ft only gives 28mile range lOS. Even 200ft base to base is only 40miles LOS.
Gary N8EMR
User avatar
WA3VJB
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:36 am

Post by WA3VJB »

in the Annapolis area, Coast Guard Group Baltimore can and does use at least two transmitters, selected as a function of which receiver is voted up and down the Chesapeake Bay.

During marine safety broadcasts on 22A they manually key up both. I've been in an area where the capture effect waggles back and forth, with different audio characteristics telling me one or the other.

I understood that their console panel indicates which of the receive sites is hearing a given vessel, to aid in tracking calls and deploying resources.
thebigphish
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 10:10 pm
What radios do you own?: AM/FM

Post by thebigphish »

...a.k.a. manual transmitter steering.
"How do you plan to outwit Death?"
"With a knight and bishop combination; I will destroy his flank.
" --Antonious Block
User avatar
Bruce1807
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:18 am

Post by Bruce1807 »

when I worked on a rail project in Australia (V\Line for the Aussies)
we had base stations covering whole lines.
These fed back via spaz attacks and main comparators to centracom I's
There was some stuff in there that auto steered so the controller would page the train on simulcast and the system would autosteer to the closest sitecould easilly be the same stuff using voting auto steer
silverbk
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:56 pm

Re: Awesomely powerful signals...what is the Coast Guard using?

Post by silverbk »

Rescue 21 is not fully operational yet, although some units have had equipment installed. The system is not in widespread use.

Most USCG small boat stations have Astro Spectras in a console with a modest tower arrangement. You will also sometimes see a direction finder antenna on their towers as well. Some stations like Rio Vista, CA have a large area of responsibilty and use what are called high sights. Their voice is sent over a leased line to a transmitter on a tower, in the case of Rio Vista 200 miles away from the actual station. The station watchstander can select which transmitter to use.

When I was stationed at Governors Island in the early 90s the watch center had 5 separate radios connected to high sights up and down the Hudson River all the way to Albany NY. The watchstander had to actually pick up a different mic depending on which high sight he needed. It was not uncommon to hear them transmitting on the wrong high sight.

We also had the AMVER center on the island back then. They had HF gear capable of speaking with vessels over much of the globe. They were able to coordinate rescues all over the world. They have since been privatized.
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”