Laird Technologies - 142-160 Phantom Antenna

This forum is dedicated to helping people with questions about installing radio equipment in vehicles. This can include antenna installs, electrical wiring questions/problems, and mounting systems. Pictures of installs are welcome.

Note: Discussions regarding lighting, sirens, and other equipment now has its own forum in the 'off-topic' section below.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
mike38015
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm

Laird Technologies - 142-160 Phantom Antenna

Post by mike38015 »

Anyone have any experience with the Laird Technologies - 142-160 Phantom Antenna good or bad?
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Re: Laird Technologies - 142-160 Phantom Antenna

Post by tvsjr »

They will work tolerably well assuming good system coverage. Keep in mind they are not capable of 142-160 - that's the maximum tuning range. They are capable of a 2MHz spread within that range, with VSWR <2.0:1. They also require a 4' x 4' ground plane (or the VSWR will suffer further) and they are only capable of 60 watts for 60 seconds (I wouldn't push that number).

Laird also sells the Phantom Elite which has all the same issues, but looks a little nicer.
Will
Posts: 6823
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm

Re: Laird Technologies - 142-160 Phantom Antenna

Post by Will »

mike38015 wrote:Anyone have any experience with the Laird Technologies - 142-160 Phantom Antenna good or bad?
BAD
RFguy
Posts: 1357
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:17 am

Re: Laird Technologies - 142-160 Phantom Antenna

Post by RFguy »

It's hard to defy the laws of physics.

When you try to squeeze a 18" antenna (1/4 wave) into a 4" tall package, you're going to give up considerable performance.

I have one vendor just send me a spec sheet for a 5.5" tall tri-band antenna (700/800, 1.9GHz, 2.4GHz) and claim 13 dBi in the 700/800. Yeah right, and if you believe that, I have some Florida swamp land for sale.
User avatar
nukedude
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:40 am
What radios do you own?: Many Motorola's

Re: Laird Technologies - 142-160 Phantom Antenna

Post by nukedude »

My work tried to use those for one specific frequency in that band. This was for use on RHIB vessels operating on the water. We gave them a solid 6x8 foot ground plane, well connected and sealed NMO connector and did not skimp on cable or connectors. They worked for about a year. Then the SWR was so high we replaced every one of them with cheap $3 Laird "whisker" antennas from Tessco. The small "whisker" or coat hanger antenna work SO much better.
Part of it could have been the saltwater environment, but from other uses of this antenna, it could just be the antenna.
Post Reply

Return to “Vehicle Radio Installs”