Startup cost for your own trunking system?
Moderator: Queue Moderator
- chipjumper
- Batboard $upporter
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 10:14 pm
- What radios do you own?: XTS5000 for work
Startup cost for your own trunking system?
How much do you guys think it would cost to start your own trunking system using used equipment bought from discount sources like eBay?
What components are need? Is there an old topic on something like this (i couldn't find one)?
What components are need? Is there an old topic on something like this (i couldn't find one)?
Specifiy some parameters
Define what you mean by "Trunking system" - a single Ham repeater is a "trunking system" as much as a single channel LTR system.
How many voice channels? How many sites? How many mobiles?
What trunking protocol? Do you want to do your own maintainance, or farm it out?
If you have more than one site, do you want to link the sites? If so, by landline or RF?
How many voice channels? How many sites? How many mobiles?
What trunking protocol? Do you want to do your own maintainance, or farm it out?
If you have more than one site, do you want to link the sites? If so, by landline or RF?
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
- chipjumper
- Batboard $upporter
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 10:14 pm
- What radios do you own?: XTS5000 for work
One site, 5 channels, using Quantars and a SmartNet controller, should cost on the order of $100,000 - $125,000 exclusive of:
Site rental and any costs of site connection equipment (combiners, etc.).
Engineering.
Licensing.
Remote control infrastructure and leased line costs.
Mobile and portable equipment.
Contingency.
Note that one of your five channels will be dedicated as a control channel, so that you will have only 4 voice channels. Depending upon how many talkgroups your 100 users are divided into, this may or may not be enough voice channels.
Single siting an 800 system can mean a limited service territory, depending on the site characteristics. 800 does not propagate like VHF and is twice as susceptible to foliation attenuation as UHF.
Site rental and any costs of site connection equipment (combiners, etc.).
Engineering.
Licensing.
Remote control infrastructure and leased line costs.
Mobile and portable equipment.
Contingency.
Note that one of your five channels will be dedicated as a control channel, so that you will have only 4 voice channels. Depending upon how many talkgroups your 100 users are divided into, this may or may not be enough voice channels.
Single siting an 800 system can mean a limited service territory, depending on the site characteristics. 800 does not propagate like VHF and is twice as susceptible to foliation attenuation as UHF.
hmmm
there are several "turn key" systems out there to be had.
the last 900 system that was an open bid with no reserve went for around $13,000. on ebay
that was a 10 channel type II privacy plus system
and BTW, unless you are already licensed, 900 is the only place you are going to get any channels for trunking.....
doug
the last 900 system that was an open bid with no reserve went for around $13,000. on ebay
that was a 10 channel type II privacy plus system
and BTW, unless you are already licensed, 900 is the only place you are going to get any channels for trunking.....
doug
- chipjumper
- Batboard $upporter
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 10:14 pm
- What radios do you own?: XTS5000 for work
I was aiming for 900Mhz...Wow, $13,000 for a turn key isn't bad! There is a Zetron LTR controller on eBay for like $450...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... tegory=296
I guess I'm out of the trunking business now. I don't think I have $100,000 yet to shell out. I wonder how much it would cost to "throw" one together using old maxtrac/gtx's, amps, and other eBay bought items
Regardless, I want to put up a 900 amatuer repeater by the end of the year.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... tegory=296
I guess I'm out of the trunking business now. I don't think I have $100,000 yet to shell out. I wonder how much it would cost to "throw" one together using old maxtrac/gtx's, amps, and other eBay bought items
![:lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Regardless, I want to put up a 900 amatuer repeater by the end of the year.
You won't be "throwing" any type of Motorola trunked system together with items such as you mentioned above. Only Micor, MSF5000, MTR2000 or Quantar repeaters can be used in the various flavours of Motorola trunked systems.chipjumper wrote: I wonder how much it would cost to "throw" one together using old maxtrac/gtx's, amps, and other eBay bought items![]()
Your best bet for a controller would likely be a "Startsite" unit. Small, 'Desktrac' sized controller. 5-channel maximum capacity, can be firmware programmed for Type I/II/IIi operation. No SmartNet features. I have looked into acquiring a few in the past, and they seem to be around $5000 U.S. or less. Can only interface to MTR2000 or MSF5000 repeaters though, as far as I know. Then there's the issue of getting a 'codeplug' blown for the unit. Approx $750 U.S. from Motorola.
The easiest repeater to use would be the MTR2000, since they can be programmed to whatever frequency you desire in the band. No crystals or retuning like the other repeaters (Well, the Quantar would be the same, but much more expensive). Not sure what kind of price you'd be looking at for those used...bank on around $3000 or so. The MSF5000 ('digital' version) would be my next choice. Still RSS programmable, but tuning is required.
Then there's the RF combining & multicoupling equipment. Assuming you could find the right stuff in the correct frequency ranges....still pricey even used. Bet on a couple thousand, maybe less.
Not to mention everything RKG said as well...
Todd
No trees were harmed in the posting of this message...however an extraordinarily large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
Welcome to the /\/\achine.
Welcome to the /\/\achine.
A "Startsite" system is, in my judgment, poor economics, since unless you really know that your system won't grow, the 5-channel limitation is something you will quickly outgrow. At that point you have to orphan the controller and start spending afresh for something with more capability. Experience says that there are few systems that are simultaneously: (a) large enough to warrant the capital costs of trunking in the first place, but (b) small enough that they won't quickly outgrow the 5-channel limitation.
In any trunked system, it is imperative that all of the repeaters be of the same type, same firmware, and (in my opinion, though others disagree) of approximately the same date of manufacture. Don't forget that at least one machine, and potentially any of the machines, must be capable of 24/7 key down "continuous duty." The only station I've ever seen that could really do that is the Quantar, though I've been told by folks I consider reliable that the MTR can as well provided only one MTR is mounted in a cabinet.
In the right circumstances, trunked radio can really work miracles in terms of spectrum efficiency. I have in mind one system that, with only 28 channel pairs, covers an entire state, with over 275 talkgroups, over 5,000 user IDs, some fascinating capabilities for dynamic patching and unpatching for special events, and for at least the public safety tier of users, not a single "busy signal" (channel request denied; no channels available) in more than 5 years. But the mistake I see (or hear about) most people making is investing the high cost of trunking for smaller applications that could be serviced with equal effectiveness and far greater fiscal economy using a well-designed conventional system.
In any trunked system, it is imperative that all of the repeaters be of the same type, same firmware, and (in my opinion, though others disagree) of approximately the same date of manufacture. Don't forget that at least one machine, and potentially any of the machines, must be capable of 24/7 key down "continuous duty." The only station I've ever seen that could really do that is the Quantar, though I've been told by folks I consider reliable that the MTR can as well provided only one MTR is mounted in a cabinet.
In the right circumstances, trunked radio can really work miracles in terms of spectrum efficiency. I have in mind one system that, with only 28 channel pairs, covers an entire state, with over 275 talkgroups, over 5,000 user IDs, some fascinating capabilities for dynamic patching and unpatching for special events, and for at least the public safety tier of users, not a single "busy signal" (channel request denied; no channels available) in more than 5 years. But the mistake I see (or hear about) most people making is investing the high cost of trunking for smaller applications that could be serviced with equal effectiveness and far greater fiscal economy using a well-designed conventional system.
LTR
LTR is a good option for an expensive solution when one site will give enough coverage. With the money saved, when compared to a Motorola format you can get the great little portables like EX600XLS or even the HT1250 LS and use MDC1200 signaling for advanced calling and alerting.
Motorola does offer "staged" systems which come from Motorola configured, programmed and tuned to your specs. We have done 4 of these systems in the last year with great results.
Motorola does offer "staged" systems which come from Motorola configured, programmed and tuned to your specs. We have done 4 of these systems in the last year with great results.
Don't forget, should you actually become able to purchase 800 frequencies from the FCC, you could always plan on Nextel's future expansion in your area and sell the equipment and frequencies to Nextel for more than they would pay the FCC for them. Just a thought....
There must be some major profit to be made by selling your customer base and your licenses to Nextel, or else the SMR's wouldn't have done that.
If you plan your system well and obtain a good tower site, your coverage will be very good. A local SMR before selling out and shutting down ran a single site from downtown and I could use my portable from about 35-40 miles from the tower.
There must be some major profit to be made by selling your customer base and your licenses to Nextel, or else the SMR's wouldn't have done that.
If you plan your system well and obtain a good tower site, your coverage will be very good. A local SMR before selling out and shutting down ran a single site from downtown and I could use my portable from about 35-40 miles from the tower.
-
- Posts: 1747
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 4:00 pm
If, for shits and giggles, you were wanting to make a 33cm ham trunked system, you would have to use LTR.
LTR is frequency independant, whereas Motorola trunking has the frequencies "hard wired" in.
Neat thing about LTR is this: you can run both conventional AND LTR on the same repeater. I wouldn't recommend this on the "home" repeater though.
LTR is frequency independant, whereas Motorola trunking has the frequencies "hard wired" in.
Neat thing about LTR is this: you can run both conventional AND LTR on the same repeater. I wouldn't recommend this on the "home" repeater though.
73 DE KC8RYW
Random Motorola Part Number:
SYN1894B - V3m Sprint-branded Battery Cover
Random Motorola Part Number:
SYN1894B - V3m Sprint-branded Battery Cover
- MO_TRASHER
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 11:13 am
Must be.....I've worked for two SMR operators that sold their "souls" to the "Evil Empire". ........Ya know...money talks...BS walks.bubbasnest wrote:Don't forget, should you actually become able to purchase 800 frequencies from the FCC, you could always plan on Nextel's future expansion in your area and sell the equipment and frequencies to Nextel for more than they would pay the FCC for them. Just a thought....
There must be some major profit to be made by selling your customer base and your licenses to Nextel, or else the SMR's wouldn't have done that.
Glad someone else thinks LTR is a good format. LTR is the least expensive system protocol to build.
Controllers are available from many sources, Zetron and IDA just to name a couple.
Radio equipment is also available from a larger pool of vendors, keeping prices down.
The 'Trasher
N3UHD
PCIA #38104
...If it ain't broke, don't fix it....
"Motorola hasn't built a radio so well that it can't be broken"
Check Out: http://www.lowerytech.net/forum
Join the fun!
Someday this'll be a REAL Site!.......
http://www.busrad.com
N3UHD
PCIA #38104
...If it ain't broke, don't fix it....
"Motorola hasn't built a radio so well that it can't be broken"
Check Out: http://www.lowerytech.net/forum
Join the fun!
Someday this'll be a REAL Site!.......
http://www.busrad.com
You are thinking in terms of public use. There are thousands of Startsite (or it's 7-channel SmartNet equivalent, SmartWorks) systems in use today world-wide. When you have a plant or other facility with a relatively static number of users, it makes perfect economic sense to only order what you need...be it 2 channels (a local casino and several hotels around here) or the maximum 5 (3 tire plants in the province). Motorola wouldn't make the product unless the demand was there.RKG wrote:A "Startsite" system is, in my judgment, poor economics, since unless you really know that your system won't grow, the 5-channel limitation is something you will quickly outgrow. At that point you have to orphan the controller and start spending afresh for something with more capability. Experience says that there are few systems that are simultaneously: (a) large enough to warrant the capital costs of trunking in the first place, but (b) small enough that they won't quickly outgrow the 5-channel limitation.
.
Todd
No trees were harmed in the posting of this message...however an extraordinarily large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
Welcome to the /\/\achine.
Welcome to the /\/\achine.
- chipjumper
- Batboard $upporter
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 10:14 pm
- What radios do you own?: XTS5000 for work
I agree that StartSite might make sense for a factory, large retail store, or high rise building, where the physical structure if nothing else ensures that one can accurate determine the potential for future growth of the system. And, yes, my focus is municipal use since that is what I see most often.
Jonathan: Motorola systems do not hard code any frequencies in the field units (mobiles and portables) other than the control channel(s). The field units get their info on the voice channel frequency from the OSW on each channel grant. This is one of the neat features of the system: voice channels can be added or deleted from a zone on the fly, without the need to reach out and program field units.
Jonathan: Motorola systems do not hard code any frequencies in the field units (mobiles and portables) other than the control channel(s). The field units get their info on the voice channel frequency from the OSW on each channel grant. This is one of the neat features of the system: voice channels can be added or deleted from a zone on the fly, without the need to reach out and program field units.
It really depends on the customer. You can have 1000 radios, all on the same channel. In this case, you certainly don't need trunking. Another client may only have 60 radios, but demand 10 unique user groups. In this case, trunking makes sense, as the alternative is 10 seperate repeaters (assuming they turn down a 'community repeater' type set-up).KF4PEP wrote:With 100 users, is trunking even worth it over conventional?
Sometimes teh simplest solutions are the best.
Todd
No trees were harmed in the posting of this message...however an extraordinarily large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
Welcome to the /\/\achine.
Welcome to the /\/\achine.
-
- Posts: 1747
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 4:00 pm
-
- was grem467
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 12:46 pm
A buddy of mine and i discussed the posibility of a Ham Trunked system.. i believe it can be MADE to be legal, but would require some workarounds. For example, on a Type II system, not all the repeaters ID with the station callsign, and would the control channel's continuous transmitting of data be considered "broadcasting".
I think an LTR could be made to be legal, as long as all repeaters were equipped with CWID.
I think an LTR could be made to be legal, as long as all repeaters were equipped with CWID.
grem467 wrote:A buddy of mine and i discussed the posibility of a Ham Trunked system.. i believe it can be MADE to be legal, but would require some workarounds. For example, on a Type II system, not all the repeaters ID with the station callsign, and would the control channel's continuous transmitting of data be considered "broadcasting".
I think an LTR could be made to be legal, as long as all repeaters were equipped with CWID.
Im already working on an LTR based ham 5-channel narrow band system to work in 70CM with the capability to use conventional inputs as well and basing it around TNT and IDA LTR controllers. With LTR there is no real "control" channel that is dedicated to control data so this eliminates the "broadcast" issues. Control data is sent out via the "home channel" and throughout the channel lineup so its not frequency dependant. The only issue so far for me will be combining narrowband channels to single sticks for Tx and Rx, the idea of multiple sticks is a recepe for intermod and receive issues.
All TNT and IDA panels will do CW-ID but they also send out "idle" messages, a short kerchunk to let the mobiles know the system is still alive. Its more like a systemwide heartbeat.
Motorola CDM-1250LS, 1550LS and 1250LS portables will do LTR trunking both wide and narrowband along with Kenwood TK-880's and a few off-brands. No you cant do LTR with your yaesu memorizer or Mocom-70... What other Motos to do LTR in the UHF band I dont know of, the only exception was the bastardized Maxtracs that used an aftermarket PROM but they were 800 and not very reliable or friendly.
KAØSQO
- chipjumper
- Batboard $upporter
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 10:14 pm
- What radios do you own?: XTS5000 for work
I think many people get hung up on the term "broadcasting". If you use the term too strictly, it would preclude things like the ARRL bulletins, ALL beacons, REVERSE Autopatch (I personally think THOSE are against the rules), or any transmission not meant for a specific person(licensed station). You are broadcasting if you send even a short transmission INTENDED for reception by NON-licensed stations. If you are sending transmissions meant only for reception, or control, or linking of HAM sytems, it should not be a problem. I belive that any of the trunking formats would be legal, as long as the pre-mentioned ID issues were solved, and I think that would be easy. If one were concerned about a control channel transmiting all the time, its just like a beacon, or a dedicated control link transmitting voted receiver info.(voting tones) and there are several systems doing that. And as I and many others have done in the past, if you need an opinion on it (permission) inquire of the FCC and they will certainly tell us one way or the other. I would like to see some trunking systems, especially on 900.
When I worked for E. F. Johnson in Eden Prairie, Minnesota in the early 1990s, we had several 440 MHz ham repeaters in Southeastern MN that were linked together and interfaced with MultiNet controllers. It was a neat network for experimenting, but would not have been practical if we had been required to pay for it with our own $$$.
Tad, K3TD