I have a VHF and UHF Quantar and a single SCom 7330 controller.  Due to available space limitations at the sites, they will be deployed in opposing sides of town but will have similar footprints.  I will be running them dual mode FM/P25.  Internet and POTS are available, but T1 is out of the question.  What would be the best way to link the 2 Quantars together.  Will I need a second 7330, or will 1 suffice?
Thanks!
~S~
			
			
									
									
						Quantar Linking 2m/440 & external controller
Moderator: Queue Moderator
- Scrotumola
 - Posts: 59
 - Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2001 4:00 pm
 
- Scrotumola
 - Posts: 59
 - Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2001 4:00 pm
 
Re: Quantar Linking 2m/440 & external controller
I should add that both decks have v.24 cards in them
			
			
									
									
						- Astro Spectra
 - Posts: 669
 - Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2001 4:00 pm
 
Re: Quantar Linking 2m/440 & external controller
Why bother with analog? Digital only is much easier and better.
			
			
									
									
						- Scrotumola
 - Posts: 59
 - Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2001 4:00 pm
 
Re: Quantar Linking 2m/440 & external controller
AS,
I'm trying to put P25 on the map here and gain a following by providing solid infrastructure, footprint and reliability. There has never been a P25 repeater here on either band and this will put P25 on the map. Further, the frequency coordinators also expressed concern about allocating a P25 only pair citing lack of demand and limited allocations, whereas DMR and Fusion are a dime a dozen. There's a lot of P25 2m around here, but on 440 it remains to be unseen, patching both machines together in both modes, I would hope promotes it's viability (akin 900mhz... it you build it, they will come.)
I look forward to your input. I've been googling and following threads and haven't found a difinitive solution.
			
			
									
									
						I'm trying to put P25 on the map here and gain a following by providing solid infrastructure, footprint and reliability. There has never been a P25 repeater here on either band and this will put P25 on the map. Further, the frequency coordinators also expressed concern about allocating a P25 only pair citing lack of demand and limited allocations, whereas DMR and Fusion are a dime a dozen. There's a lot of P25 2m around here, but on 440 it remains to be unseen, patching both machines together in both modes, I would hope promotes it's viability (akin 900mhz... it you build it, they will come.)
I look forward to your input. I've been googling and following threads and haven't found a difinitive solution.
- Scrotumola
 - Posts: 59
 - Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2001 4:00 pm
 
Re: Quantar Linking 2m/440 & external controller
AS,
I'm trying to put P25 on the map here and gain a following by providing solid infrastructure, footprint and reliability. There has never been a P25 repeater here on either band and this will put P25 on the map. Further, the frequency coordinators also expressed concern about allocating a P25 only pair citing lack of demand and limited allocations, whereas DMR and Fusion are a dime a dozen. There's a lot of P25 2m around here, but on 440 it remains to be unseen, patching both machines together in both modes, I would hope promotes it's viability (akin 900mhz... it you build it, they will come.)
I look forward to your input. I've been googling and following threads and haven't found a difinitive solution.
			
			
									
									
						I'm trying to put P25 on the map here and gain a following by providing solid infrastructure, footprint and reliability. There has never been a P25 repeater here on either band and this will put P25 on the map. Further, the frequency coordinators also expressed concern about allocating a P25 only pair citing lack of demand and limited allocations, whereas DMR and Fusion are a dime a dozen. There's a lot of P25 2m around here, but on 440 it remains to be unseen, patching both machines together in both modes, I would hope promotes it's viability (akin 900mhz... it you build it, they will come.)
I look forward to your input. I've been googling and following threads and haven't found a difinitive solution.