What's so bad about VSLEP?

This forum is dedicated to discussions pertaining specifically to the Motorola ASTRO line of radios (those that use VSELP/IMBE/AMBE), including using digital modulation, digital programming, FlashPort upgrades, etc. If you have general questions please use the General or Programming forums.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
RESCUE161
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 2062
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Too many!

What's so bad about VSLEP?

Post by RESCUE161 »

I saw a post that mentioned that the new Uniden scanners cannot monitor VSLEP. Is this true? Are there any advantages to using IMBE as compared to VSLEP?
Thanks,
Scott
User avatar
nitornemo
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 12:05 pm

Re: What's so bad about VSLEP?

Post by nitornemo »

RESCUE161 wrote:I saw a post that mentioned that the new Uniden scanners cannot monitor VSLEP. Is this true? Are there any advantages to using IMBE as compared to VSLEP?
Thanks,
Scott
Hey Scott,
Thanks for the reply on the other subject.

I posted that VSLEP couldn't be monitored.
I had this bigtime scanner buff boasting how his 730+ dollar APCO scanner "DOES IT ALL".
so, I gave him one of my astro simplex channels and he heard nothing but the digital carrier.

This could have been operator failure on his part but because VSLEP is not APCO the scanner couldn't decode this flavor of astro! (I think :roll: I'm still an astro newbee if measured by the others out here!)
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: APX4K, XTL5K, NX5200, NX700HK

Re: What's so bad about VSLEP?

Post by Josh »

RESCUE161 wrote:I saw a post that mentioned that the new Uniden scanners cannot monitor VSLEP. Is this true? Are there any advantages to using IMBE as compared to VSLEP?
Thanks,
Scott
VSELP is noisy and old. It is/was Motorola's original "ASTRO" product. It's a Motorola proprietary format used by few agencies/companies, namely The City of Cleveland, Nextel, and Southernlinc, although the latter 2 are even worse as they're compressed.

At any rate, few agencies use VSELP as IMBE is the 'open' protocol for APCO-25 compliance.

-Josh
ASTROMODAT
Posts: 1825
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 12:32 am

Post by ASTROMODAT »

VSELP is not necessarily better, or worse, than IMBE. The point is that these involve two different VOCODERs. IMBE won out as the Comman Air Interface (CAI) standard in connection with P25. Just like VHS vs. BETA, die hards still argue the merits of each, but in the end, it's the industry standard that always wins out. That's why I feel sorry for any agency that got suckered into VSELP----it's going to cost them a lot of money to become P25 compliant!

Larry
User avatar
ASTRO_25
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 360
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by ASTRO_25 »

VSELP really doesn't sound any different than IMBE. In fact, if I recall, Nextel is based on the VSELP vocoder.... so it works just fine.
Yummy.... bacon and eggs.
User avatar
wavetar
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by wavetar »

VSELP does somewhat "sound" different, but the main thing is it's not as robust as IMBE. I have some notes & comparison graphs somewhere, showing the difference in audio quality vs. signal strength for both. IMBE is clearly superior over a wider range, simply because it's a better A/D method than the linear prediction model on which VSELP is based. Thus, it was chosen as the APCO-25 standard digital protocol over VSELP. The reason your buddy's scanner couldn't decode it...scanner manufacturers aren't putting any effort into developing a product to scan a dead-end technology.

Todd
Post Reply

Return to “Legacy Batboard Motorola ASTRO (VSELP/IMBE/AMBE) Equipment Forum”