Page 1 of 1

What Radio

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 3:36 pm
by Cam
If you had to pick one of those two radio's, which one would it be. I guess we will say that radio will be used in a conventional system. So overall, those who have used one or both, which one?

The Motorola HT1250:

128 channels (8 zones)
Emergency Button
EscalertTM Call Features
Internal VOX
14 Character Alphanumeric Display
RSSI Indicator
Caller ID

Quik-Call II Signaling (decode)
MDC 1200 Signaling (encode/decode)
Battery Gauge

The Kenwood TK-280/380

LTR Trunked Mode and Conventional
High-Channel Capacity
600 Channels in Trunked Mode
250 Channels in Conventional Mode.
FleetSyncTM Alpha-numeric Two-way Paging.
Multiple Scanning Functions
DTMF Signaling & Dialing Features
Wideband Coverage
MIL-STD 810 C/D/E
12 Character Dot Matrix LCD
10 Character Alphanumeric Alias
X-Pand Audio Enhancement
Programmable function buttons for easy access to features
High/low power adjustments to conserve battery life
Scan mode to scan channels for activity
Monitor transmissions to locate clear channels
Repeater talkaround for unit to unit communication, bypassing the repeater
Telephone Interconnect Capable
Front Panel Programmable Phone List

one sided?

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 4:19 pm
by 925slave
I was just wandering why options like hi-low power, repeater-talkaround, and programmable function buttons are listed for the Kenwood but not on the Motorola? Seems to make one lean toward the Kenwwod if you just read the options listed here. I would buy the Motorola before Kenwood due to past experience.

My 2 cents

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 9:11 pm
by Rick Rock
Motorola, 14 Character Alphanumeric Display, Quik-Call II Signaling (encode + code) MDC 1200 Signaling (encode/decode), Multiple Scanning Functions, DTMF Signaling & Dialing Features, MOTOROLA

Need I say More?!

neither

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:34 pm
by medic4145
Neither!!!! I am a diehard dedicated Motorola user,however, the HT1250 sucks for public safety use. And what is a kenwood??? :wink:

just my 2 cents worth

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2004 12:32 am
by Jay911
Ugh... no offense, but IMO that's a heck of a choice.. kinda like "Do you want to get hit in the head with a bat or a 2x4?"

We have TK380s and HT750s on my department. The TK380s were bought by a member off eBay and I'm not that much of a fan. Besides the fact they're old and beaten up, they seem less like public safety radios than any Motorola radio I've used.

The HT750s aren't my favorites either. You just can't seem to get alerting (QCII) to happen on them, the audio is awfully crackly and noisy, and quite frankly the whole thing doesn't seem the right size. It seems way too small to me.

I still like the MT2000 for conventional and MTS2000 for trunking. Haven't tried an XTS yet.

--j.

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2004 7:38 am
by firemed9
I would go with the TK-x80 series from Kenwood. They are pretty durable and will do most of the functions the Motorolas will. The really good thing about the kenwoods are they are unlimited scan. You can scan as many or as few channels that you want, as opposed to Motorola you have a max amount of channels you can scan at once.

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2004 8:21 am
by jim
I like Motorola, but I have to say go with the Kenny!

Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:42 pm
by KitN1MCC
all i can say is MDC-1200 stock

or go with a Can and a String

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 10:13 am
by RADIOMAN2002
Don't even bother with the 1250, go directly to the 1550LS. Makes all the others seem less. Has MDC encode/decode, quickcall encode/decode, roughly 256 channels,4 liones of alphanumeric info, voice storage,with LTR trunking. Even if you department doesn't have trunking, if you want any new channel from the FCC you have to go to some sort of trunking.