Rail Car Cell antenna for Verizon

This forum is dedicated to helping people with questions about installing radio equipment in vehicles. This can include antenna installs, electrical wiring questions/problems, and mounting systems. Pictures of installs are welcome.

Note: Discussions regarding lighting, sirens, and other equipment now has its own forum in the 'off-topic' section below.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
KitN1MCC
Posts: 1890
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: ht1550 XLS,6 MT-1000,

Rail Car Cell antenna for Verizon

Post by KitN1MCC »

i need to install 2 hands free kits into cars at the rail road here in essex ct

i am thinking about going with a antenna Specialist "transit antenna"

but i think a whip with gain may work out better juts not 100% shure yet

any ideads
k2hz
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:27 am

Post by k2hz »

While the gain whip will work slightly better for communications, it may not survive in the railroad environment.

In addition to the breakage problem, there may be safety issues.

I recently did a RR VHF installation in a privately owned Pullman car.
The car owner informed me that there was a warning from Amtrak against use of whip antennas due to danger of arcing to the 25 KV catenary.

I used a Radiall/Larsen Mirage low profile antenna.
KitN1MCC
Posts: 1890
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: ht1550 XLS,6 MT-1000,

Post by KitN1MCC »

i use a sinclair locomotive on the rail road frequency thay work good
SlimBob
Posts: 911
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 11:38 am

Post by SlimBob »

k2hz wrote:I recently did a RR VHF installation in a privately owned Pullman car.
The car owner informed me that there was a warning from Amtrak against use of whip antennas due to danger of arcing to the 25 KV catenary.

I used a Radiall/Larsen Mirage low profile antenna.
I'd say that's a strong incentive not to use a whip. :)
User avatar
JohnWayne
Posts: 208
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 8:59 pm

Post by JohnWayne »

Sounds like a perfect application for the Antenex Phantom antennas. They are low-profile and won't (or shouldn't) arc to the catenary like a normal whip would. You can check them out at http://shop.waltel.com under Mobile Antennas.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Jeff
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Post by tvsjr »

Considering you're looking at rail service, I wouldn't use anything based on a standard NMO mount. Use a real transit antenna... they ain't cheap, but they'll hold up to that kind of service.

Arcing to the catenary would be a bee-itch.
k2hz
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:27 am

Post by k2hz »

I selected the Larsen Mirage instead of an Antennex Phantom for the Pullman car because the Larsen is factory tuned to 160.2-162.7. Field tuning a Phantom mounted on top of the car would have involved a lot of trial and error and climbing on and off the top of the car to check each adjustment.

I agree that NMO mounts may be a problem in RR service if the antenna is in a vulnerable location. Some RRs require that anything mounted on a car or locomtive in a location where someone is likely to climb when doing maintenance must be strong enough to support the weight of a man in case someone tries to grab it for a handhold.

The Sinclair Excaliber is the "gold standard" for RR use. It is a pain to install but it is indestructible. Transit antennas are a second choce but the radome is still subject to damage.

I was told the Amtrak warning was due to an actual incident where a combination of low catenary and a high antenna on a private car had disasterous results.
User avatar
wa2zdy
Posts: 1744
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 9:13 am

Post by wa2zdy »

k2hz wrote:I was told the Amtrak warning was due to an actual incident where a combination of low catenary and a high antenna on a private car had disasterous results.
Yep, the catenary is lower in stations, etc. I'm thinking Penn Station in NYC where the catenary is very low and the pantographs are almost in the fully down position. So Amtrak is correct; the whip is a VERY bad idea.

Good luck.
Chris,
Hamming 31 years
http://www.wa2zdy.com
Wesley Chapel, Pasco County, Florida
Snow? What's that?!
The human race is proof that Darwin was wrong.
KitN1MCC
Posts: 1890
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: ht1550 XLS,6 MT-1000,

Post by KitN1MCC »

umm well our cars never leave the short line only worry is trees ( the cars dont have rollser Bearing)

i might just go with the antenna specialist tranist or the sinclair randome

i wish they made the excailibur in 800mhz
spareparts
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 502
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 5:33 pm

Post by spareparts »

KitN1MCC wrote:umm well our cars never leave the short line only worry is trees ( the cars dont have roller Bearing)
Family friend is a part owner of a Private Car. They have a RR Spectra and a low profile Sinclair antenna.

Fully FRA Compliant, set up for Head end power, 27 pin trainline connector, with a 100 KW genset for the hotel load when HEP is not available. BTW, They just spent a ton of money on the PC2 inspection where they lift the car off the trucks. It was even more expensive to abate the asbestos prior starting the restoration.

Too rich for me....

Martin
Post Reply

Return to “Vehicle Radio Installs”