zzpot wrote:I will heed your few words of caution! ( KbOnly ) and probably print the post out and read it a few times so it can kick in.
<BigSnip>
(Kc7qr) some disadvantages which outweigh whatever tiny amount of positive you might get. Those three points made perfect sense especially about the rf burn to your eyes. Yes and you made the correct call it is a vhf radio in fact it was the worst sounding one of my collection but I think a new speaker will probably clear that up.
Hey and the advice channel is open to you on equipment needed well to make sure they are 2 watts to start with and power drain !
Thanks for you Input Kc7qr
zz
You are entirely welcome, but I'm not the best person to ask about test gear. I tend to have relatively expensive tastes along those lines, and my recommendations would reflect that.
With that said, if you don't mind stretching a bit on test gear, you may want to consider digging around for an older service monitor. This will give you, at the bare minimum, a signal generator and transmitter analyzer in one package. Depending on which one you find, it may also have various signaling schemes (PL, DPL, paging, other?) and spectrum analyzer functionality.
If you do pursue that option, be prepared to spend anywhere from $400 to over $4K, depending on what you find and what options it has. It is my understanding that the Motorola R2200's make pretty good workhorses. You may also want to look into gear from IFR/Aeroflex, specifically the 1200, 1600, or 1900 series. All are usually available on the used arena at decent prices.
I can make some bare-bones recommendations if you don't want to hunt up a service monitor at this time. Start with a good DC bench supply, variable from 0-20V at 0-5A, and (ideally) metered for both voltage and current and shielded against RF. This will suffice for the vast majority of portable gear you may run across.
For mobile gear, you need something a bit beefier. Motorola made a monster supply, 0-40V at 0-40A, which was a strange combination of linear and SMPS in the same cabinet. I have one, and it is a monster to move, but it works extremely well and it is filtered against RF intrusion.
You will also need at least a dummy load and thruline wattmeter. You can also use a 'Termaline' (a wattmeter with a dummy load built in), though this won't let you connect an antenna if you wish.
Discussions about the type of multimeter to get have often taken on the intensity and flame-throwing of similar arguments invoking two Unix utilities, vi and emacs. Picking a multimeter is a very personal choice, but know that you cannot go wrong with Fluke.
For receiver testing, you absolutely, positively, HAVE to have a decent signal generator that can be modulated in the FM mode, phase-locked at the desired frequency, and that can be accurately adjusted for output over a range of, say, -130dBm to 0dBm. Fluke and HP both make good ones that have often appeared on the used market.
That's all I can think of for now. Happy hunting.