Advice on short or low-profile dualband antenna?

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Woody_99
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:41 pm

Advice on short or low-profile dualband antenna?

Post by Woody_99 »

Hey, I have an Astro van going into a low parking garage and need a shorter antenna. Currently it barely fits clanging all the way through they say. Current antenna is a maxrad cell-look antenna about 12" or so.

Question is, is there a decent low-profile UHF/VHF antenna that works?

I figure they're all dummy loads, but he needs something done.

NMO mount, and rooftop location cannot be changed to window or other type. I have to make it work as-is...

thanks!
•·•·•

Woody

---Please use the EMAIL button, not PM, tnx!---
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Post by tvsjr »

How about drilling a second hole? Run a VHF and a UHF into a diplexer?
User avatar
wa2zdy
Posts: 1744
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 9:13 am

Post by wa2zdy »

What do you mean by "decent?" A 12 inch antenna is already a loss antenna on high band. To merely have unity gain you need 18-19" on high band/2m. Of course a quarter wave on UHF is 6". The best bet for anything resembling decent is a quarter wave on high band which will also work on UHF.

The only glitch to the 3/4 wave on UHF is the angle of radiation will be high but it'll work.

Smaller than 12 inches and you're really limiting your performance.
Chris,
Hamming 31 years
http://www.wa2zdy.com
Wesley Chapel, Pasco County, Florida
Snow? What's that?!
The human race is proof that Darwin was wrong.
User avatar
MTS2000des
Posts: 3347
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 4:59 pm
What radios do you own?: XTS2500, XTS5000, and MTS2000

Post by MTS2000des »

the Diamond NR-72BNMO comes to mind, it's actually pretty decent. Requires a permanent (non-magnetic mount)

http://www.rfparts.com/diamond/nr72bnmo.html

No, it's not a super gain antenna, but it performs better than a quarterwave on each band. It looks like a cellphone/800 antenna. I think I paid 40 bucks for mine.
The views here are my own and do not represent those of anyone else or the company, the boss, his wife, his dog or distant relatives.
User avatar
Bruce1807
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:18 am

Post by Bruce1807 »

Check tessco.com
They have lots of low profile stuff in most bands
User avatar
Woody_99
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:41 pm

Post by Woody_99 »

Wow... that's a lot at once, thanks!
to quickly answer all, I can't drill or install anything else,
I didn't climb on the roof and measure the antenna, it's a cell-type, quarterwave on both bands with the coiled load in the middle, but it is about 2" too tall for the ceiling. We're in West Virginia so the higher the AOR the better in most cases, and thanks for the links!!
Whew, that was a mouthful. :D

Maybe I should rephrase....

What is the best NMO low-profile dualband antenna made?

thanks!
•·•·•

Woody

---Please use the EMAIL button, not PM, tnx!---
User avatar
wa2zdy
Posts: 1744
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 9:13 am

Post by wa2zdy »

That Diamond antenna lists the gain on both bands as 2.15dBi. dBi is gain over an ideal radiator - no such thing exists. That 2.15dBi translates to ZERO dBd - gain over a dipole, a more realistic measurement.

That antenna could show some marginal gain over a 1/4 wave on UHF but not on high band. If a 1/4 wave is unity gain and is (for the 2m band) 19 inches, how is a 13 inch antenna going to be better?

No way, it ain't happening. If that thing works better than your 19 inch whip, you have issues with the 19 incher.

If that's the best you can do Woody, so be it. Just be realistic in your expecations.
Chris,
Hamming 31 years
http://www.wa2zdy.com
Wesley Chapel, Pasco County, Florida
Snow? What's that?!
The human race is proof that Darwin was wrong.
User avatar
Woody_99
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:41 pm

Post by Woody_99 »

Chris... well, I understand the facts presented, but what I need
is the shortest antenna I can get, and we know performance will suffer.

The issue is antenna height, not performance. We will make due with whatever works, but we have to get the size reduced.

The diamond antenna linked above is an inch longer than the one in use, so obviously it won't help.

I'm looking for the small radome [dummy loads] that are only inches high. Question is, does anyone make such a critter for vhf/uhf or am I stuck? I figure they all suck, but if there is one, who makes the best of the worst?

thanks!
•·•·•

Woody

---Please use the EMAIL button, not PM, tnx!---
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Post by tvsjr »

I've not seen any of the can-type transit antennas that are dual-band, until you get up into the 850/1.9 type units.

I think the second hole and two antennas combined is going to be your best bet.

Or lose one band.
User avatar
Woody_99
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:41 pm

bummer...

Post by Woody_99 »

Yep... I'm beginning to think you're right tv.... :cry:

It would qualify as a ham antenna I suppose, so probably not a real market for it. I've not found one to date either...
thanks for the advice though!
•·•·•

Woody

---Please use the EMAIL button, not PM, tnx!---
User avatar
Pj
Moderator
Posts: 5147
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: X9000 thru APX

Post by Pj »

I replaced the big brother version of this antenna..with this antenna.

I must say that I am very happy with it running my APRS stuff. I haven't noticed anything better or worse between the two, and using it in a mountainous/valley area.

I bought it last year in Dayton. To me, it looked like I was RX/TXing within the same coverage from OH to NY.

Just my two cents.
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
Image
User avatar
Woody_99
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:41 pm

Post by Woody_99 »

Cool.... which antenna? I think ya missed the link.
thanks!
•·•·•

Woody

---Please use the EMAIL button, not PM, tnx!---
User avatar
wa2zdy
Posts: 1744
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 9:13 am

Post by wa2zdy »

If you go with separate antennas, at least you can do a full quarter wave for UHF.
Chris,
Hamming 31 years
http://www.wa2zdy.com
Wesley Chapel, Pasco County, Florida
Snow? What's that?!
The human race is proof that Darwin was wrong.
User avatar
Pj
Moderator
Posts: 5147
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: X9000 thru APX

Post by Pj »

I had this orginally on the truck (Still have it...going on the Jeep soon)
http://www.rfparts.com/diamond/nr770hbnmo.html

I now have this on the Suburban:
http://www.rfparts.com/diamond/nr72bnmo.html

Like I said, at least for me, I haven't really noticed a difference.
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
Image
User avatar
N4DES
was KS4VT
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 7:59 am
What radios do you own?: APX,XTS2500,XTL2500,XTL1500

Post by N4DES »

I have the Austin Dual Bander that stands 19" tall and works very well on the roof of my Explorer, but after reading the original post it maybe too long for his application.

Just in case anyone is interested here is the url and it's at the bottom of the page:

http://www.austinantenna.net/multiband.htm

Mark
ku4zs1
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:56 pm

Post by ku4zs1 »

http://www.hamstick.com/nmo270.htm

I have two of those on the back of my Saturn. Work pretty good, not wonderful, but good enough. I wanted low profile as well.
User avatar
Woody_99
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:41 pm

Post by Woody_99 »

Well, thanks for all the info guys. I guess tv has the final answer...
only option I see is the diplexer and single band radomes.

I assume it's as simple as another hole and two jumpers?


thanks!
•·•·•

Woody

---Please use the EMAIL button, not PM, tnx!---
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Post by tvsjr »

Woody_99 wrote:Well, thanks for all the info guys. I guess tv has the final answer...
only option I see is the diplexer and single band radomes.

I assume it's as simple as another hole and two jumpers?
Affirmative on the hole, negative on the jumpers. You need to buy a diplexor (duplexer...) which will direct the VHF components to the VHF antenna alone... ditto the UHF. Such widgets are built by Diamond, Comet, and others.
User avatar
Woody_99
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:41 pm

Post by Woody_99 »

Ok, cool. I'll check 'em out.
thanks!
•·•·•

Woody

---Please use the EMAIL button, not PM, tnx!---
GlennD
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:00 am

Post by GlennD »

Comet makes a rubber dual band NMO mount antenna that is around 19 in tall. I put one on my 4Runner after my garage door killed my Diamond antenna.

It works OK for me and has good return loss on my SiteMaster.
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”