MTSX Lab 2.0 vs 3.0 on XTS3Ks

This forum is for discussions regarding all aspects of Motorola radio programming, including hardware, computers, installation and use of RSS/CPS, firmware upgrades, and troubleshooting. There are subforums for discussions of codeplugs, and also for software/firmware release notes and issues.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
PhillyPhoto
was LuiePL
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:09 am
What radios do you own?: XTS5000, APX2000

MTSX Lab 2.0 vs 3.0 on XTS3Ks

Post by PhillyPhoto »

Can anyone explain the pros and cons of each version in regards to using them on XTS3000s? I.E. which will be easier to use, and won't brick the radio. Also, if anyone knows if the CPS version that was used to program the XTS last has any effect on using it. I'm mainly interested in the use of it to read/write s-records with IMBE in them, given the firmware is an "I" or "N" version in the recieving radio. Thanks.

(P.S. I'm not asking for any software, just inquiring about the theoritical use of the software, so please don't lock this thread)
jmr061
was KB9KST
Posts: 3176
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by jmr061 »

There is a great misconception about IMBE and labs. If you are NOT unpacking a codeplug it doesn't matter what lab you use. Any astro lab or mtsx lab will work fine for reading and forcing non unpacked archive files and s-records.

Jason
User avatar
PhillyPhoto
was LuiePL
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:09 am
What radios do you own?: XTS5000, APX2000

Post by PhillyPhoto »

KB9KST wrote:There is a great misconception about IMBE and labs. If you are NOT unpacking a codeplug it doesn't matter what lab you use. Any astro lab or mtsx lab will work fine for reading and forcing non unpacked archive files and s-records.

Jason
OK, but is there that much of a difference between version 2 and 3, that would make someone not want to use v2 (MTSX)? Or if all you're doing is throwing an s-record into an XTS3K, there is no real problem, as long as you don't unpack the archive?
jmr061
was KB9KST
Posts: 3176
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by jmr061 »

It doesnt matter what version you use.

Jason
User avatar
PhillyPhoto
was LuiePL
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:09 am
What radios do you own?: XTS5000, APX2000

Post by PhillyPhoto »

What effect does the firmware have on s-records? For example:

Donor:
Host 7.23
DSP N8.03

New:
Host 7.03
DSP N7.23

If you throw an s-record from the donor into the new radio, would you get limited functionality, or would you get a fail error?
User avatar
n7maq
Posts: 1440
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Mocom 70 w/scan!!

Post by n7maq »

LuiePL wrote:What effect does the firmware have on s-records? For example:

Donor:
Host 7.23
DSP N8.03

New:
Host 7.03
DSP N7.23

If you throw an s-record from the donor into the new radio, would you get limited functionality, or would you get a fail error?
It will work just fine.

Jim.
User avatar
wavetar
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by wavetar »

I have for a fact received "fail 01/92" errors when using both Astro LAB 3.04 and MTSX LAB 2.00.01 when reading regular codeplugs (ie: not packed) and then forcing them into a target radio.

Please note, the method I'm referring to is when you read the codeplug, and get the "codeplug too new/old" error, then force it in anyway.

MTSX 3.02.00 will allow you to do this with the Astro radios with no problems.

If you happen to have a 'packed' archive or S-record, or read a radio directly with the "no pack/unpack" option, any LAB version will do.

The error you get when trying to read an IMBE codeplug with Astro LAB 3.04 is some sort of "unrecognized block unpack" message...it's been years so I can't recall it exactly.
No trees were harmed in the posting of this message...however an extraordinarily large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

Welcome to the /\/\achine.
Post Reply

Return to “Radio Programming”