Infinity P777

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Locked
aaknitt
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:17 pm

Infinity P777

Post by aaknitt »

First off, if the mods feel this is more appropriate for the RIB forum just let me know...I'm posting it here because this board gets more traffic.

In the latest issue of MissionCritical I saw an advertisement for this radio:

http://www.wwtechnologiesdirect.com/ima ... eb2007.pdf

Apparently they're selling them for $159. Has anyone tried these out? Is it legit or snake oil? I'm guessing these are cheap Chinese radios, but if they meet the MilSpecs they claim to and can sell them for that price, it's going to be hard to beat for a lot of small volunteer departments.

If anyone with experience with these could offer some insights that would be great.

Thanks in advance,

Andy
User avatar
NCSHP311
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:36 pm
What radios do you own?: Astro Saber, XTS', APX's

Post by NCSHP311 »

I bought one off ebay very similar.....good for short distance TX, battery life is about 6 hours maybe 8 if you have a real good charge!
aaknitt
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:17 pm

Post by aaknitt »

What kind of battery did that radio come with? These ones are supposed to come with 1200mAH Li-Ion, so they should have decent life.

I think the only major difference between the ones on ebay and these ones (besides maybe the battery) is that these ones seem to be FCC Part 90 certified. Here are the docs:

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/e ... imeout=500

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/e ... imeout=500

I've never seen an FCC compliant radio offered at that price, but it seems legit??

Andy
aaknitt
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:17 pm

Post by aaknitt »

I bought one just for kicks to try out. It's kind of an attempt at a cross between fully frequency-agile ham radio and a commercial radio. You get what you pay for though. It does sound like the company is trying to make some improvements, but I'd have a hard time recommending it to a fire department. Maybe for a SAR team, etc....PM me for more info.

Andy
User avatar
escomm
Queue Moderator
Posts: 5170
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:24 pm

Post by escomm »

If my fire department chose those radios I would move to another town 'cus it's obvious they are not serious about their business.

What's next--- ambulances made by Yugo ?
User avatar
Wicho
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:15 am
What radios do you own?: Realistic Space Command

Post by Wicho »

Same thing as the Puxing PX-777. Buy 100 of them from Puxing directly and you can get them for very cheap. I played with the idea of buying them but opted against it. They've received decent reviews on some of the UK PMR444 websites though.
User avatar
mikegilbert
Posts: 657
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 12:08 am
What radios do you own?: All of them

Post by mikegilbert »

Typical beater-quality radios that have no place in ANY Public Safety environment.
Better antenna and front -end, reports show that the radio sees 10 -18 miles added range, radio to radio over other competitive models.
Haha, "competitive models" - they must be talking about these:
Image

-Mike
aaknitt
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:17 pm

Post by aaknitt »

Yeah...I've been corresponding with the company marketing these in the U.S. quite a bit via email, and they can't stop bragging about how they get 12-30 miles more range than similar radios. That's the first thing that threw up the red flags when I saw their literature...if you're going to brag, at least make it somewhat believable. The best quote was how the "extraordinary gain antenna" is what makes it get this alleged range improvement. A rubber duck is a rubber duck is a rubber duck. Jeesh.

They have changed the firmware in these radios from the PX-777 to do 2.5 kHz steps, plus a bunch of other things, but they're still a consumer-grade radio as far as I'm concerned. I'm trying to decide if I should send this one back or just hang on to it as a spare...can't ever have too many radios, right? :-)

Andy
User avatar
mikegilbert
Posts: 657
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 12:08 am
What radios do you own?: All of them

Post by mikegilbert »

A buddy of mine bought a Red "Jing Song" radio or whatever it was branded as. It was pretty sensitive, but felt like $40...and that's what it cost.

I'm pretty sure these are all from the same factory and are just "re-branded" to suit the company pushing them. Think "black box" radios in the back of MRT. I wouldn't be surprised if one of these was inside one of those fake Kenwood TK-3XXX/2XXX on ebay.
Quarterwave
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 7:15 pm

Post by Quarterwave »

I had a conversation with mr kirimuss about these radios, I wanted to buy 4 for eval, he was all fired up, but he got pi$$y when I wanted the software, even though I sell and service equipment, am a self mantained end user, and a licsensee...he said he would have to lock them. I said my point was to be able to demo them to a FD, etc and I would need to put thier freqs in. I understand being a steward of the air waves, I wont sell to someone and program to a freq w/o a license, but I sell all the time with no prog, I can't control what they do after that, I just disclaimer it. heck some of these people have alot more s/w than I do! Anywho ol chuck was all crappy about it like I was doing something wrong, so I said never mind. What a yo-yo.
Rayjk110
Banned
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:10 pm

Post by Rayjk110 »

Looks like all of the speaker mics in that catalog are clones from the company Pryme, inc.

I will be somewhat interested when they try to copy an XTS or Astro radio. :wink:
User avatar
Tom in D.C.
Posts: 3859
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Progreso soup can with CRT

Those "radios"...

Post by Tom in D.C. »

Take a close look at the claims on that PDF sheet. First of all the
antenna gain specs are pure baloney. Second, down the sheet it says the audio output is 5 watts. Now, wouldn't THAT be
something in a portable? I did a closeup on the printing and there
is no decimal point; it does say 5 watts.

You get what you pay for, and the truth in that saying never changes.
Tom in D.C.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
aaknitt
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:17 pm

Post by aaknitt »

Quarterwave wrote:I had a conversation with mr kirimuss about these radios, I wanted to buy 4 for eval, he was all fired up, but he got pi$$y when I wanted the software, even though I sell and service equipment, am a self mantained end user, and a licsensee...he said he would have to lock them. I said my point was to be able to demo them to a FD, etc and I would need to put thier freqs in. I understand being a steward of the air waves, I wont sell to someone and program to a freq w/o a license, but I sell all the time with no prog, I can't control what they do after that, I just disclaimer it. heck some of these people have alot more s/w than I do! Anywho ol chuck was all crappy about it like I was doing something wrong, so I said never mind. What a yo-yo.
That's odd. The software wasn't an issue for the one I bought (which I have since sent back and got a refund for). In fact, you can program most of the radio without the software. They're really walking the line with Part 90 with these radios. Hold down a button while turning the radio on and it turns into a frequency agile radio...you can punch in anything you want. Please don't sell these to a fire department...they may buy them, but you'll be doing them a disservice.

Andy
willbartlett
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by willbartlett »

crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap !!!!!!!

"Just" like an ex-600, but without all those wasteful, annoying internal shields to mitigate EMI, intermod, unintended emissions, etc.....


They're trying, but really, "MilspecFCC" What the hell does that mean?

ImageImage



Will
User avatar
xmo
Moderator
Posts: 2549
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by xmo »

A lounge topic...
Locked

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”