Can someone tell me if an MT1000 will tune reliably all the way down
to 144.39 mHz? My gut feeling is that it would be a crap shoot, with
high possibility of failure, but I need the experience of someone who has
done this or at least tried to do it.
Thanks.
MT1000 VHF on 144.39 mHz???
Moderator: Queue Moderator
- Tom in D.C.
- Posts: 3859
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: Progreso soup can with CRT
MT1000 VHF on 144.39 mHz???
Tom in D.C.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
Re: MT1000 VHF on 144.39 mHz???
Put one on MARS freqs at the high end of 143. Full output power. Receive sensitivity went from about .18 in band to about .22, if I remember correctly. Getting the proper split antenna helped the range as much as anything.
- Andy Brinkley
- Batboard $upporter
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: FMR80D and a Motrac with Scan
Re: MT1000 VHF on 144.39 mHz???
Mike -
I just happened to have a 146-174 mhz MT-1000 on the bench and programmed in 144.390. Receiver was -11 db and the transmit was -1.2 db off of a 154 mhz already programmed in the radio.
On this radio the VCO locked, but I have had MT-1000's that would not lock on the upper end of 144 mhz.
I just happened to have a 146-174 mhz MT-1000 on the bench and programmed in 144.390. Receiver was -11 db and the transmit was -1.2 db off of a 154 mhz already programmed in the radio.
On this radio the VCO locked, but I have had MT-1000's that would not lock on the upper end of 144 mhz.
Andy / NC4AB
- Tom in D.C.
- Posts: 3859
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: Progreso soup can with CRT
Re: MT1000 VHF on 144.39 mHz???
Thanks for the info. I'm sure it'll be helpful. Results are
just about what I would have guessed but it's better to
have the advantage of individual experiences.
Regards,
just about what I would have guessed but it's better to
have the advantage of individual experiences.
Regards,
Tom in D.C.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.