simulcast monitoring

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
topcop1833
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:36 pm

simulcast monitoring

Post by topcop1833 »

All,
I have included a link to this same question below that I posted over at radioreference. some of the replies don't seem to add up, i can be hard headed sometimes so I thought I'd post it here too for some other perspectives.

Long story short, why does audio from a simulcast site decoded by a trunked radio sound better than it does when using a PSR500 trunk tracking or even an XTS while scanning conventionally. all three radios are with in inches of each other. my personal XTS was even programed as a trunking radio for a bit to show that the audio could be decoded properly.
i apologize if this question has been asked several times, no matter how i searched i didn't get any results.



http://forums.radioreference.com/genera ... ional.html
RADIOMAN2002
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: More than I can count

Re: simulcast monitoring

Post by RADIOMAN2002 »

I noticed the same with our county's simulcast system also, but I have Spectra's and Astro Sabers that don't handle the phase distortion well, as compared to the XTS and XTL radios we have, so the only thing I can say is that the actual Motorola radio handles the handling of the data/audio differently, more than likely in the Vocoder board. Scanners and my older radios are not as up to date with their Vocoders.
RADIOMAN2002
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: More than I can count

Re: simulcast monitoring

Post by RADIOMAN2002 »

I thought of this after I finished the last post, The receivers themselves are probably different also. More designed to handle the digital modulations than older radios, scanners usually have a compromise receive due to receiving so many formats across so many bands.
Spiffy50
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:37 am

Re: simulcast monitoring

Post by Spiffy50 »

This is a stab in the dark, but could it be that the frequency stability on a scanner isn't as good as the Motorola radio? From what I understand, for a simulcast system work work properly, frequency timing has to be bang-on with all radios involved. I could easily see a consumer grade radio not working so hot.
User avatar
kb0uxv
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 5:22 pm

Re: simulcast monitoring

Post by kb0uxv »

If you are listening to simulcast in conventional mode , the modulator should be set to CQPSK. C4FM should only be used on single sites. CQPSK will work on both types. If you had a XTS/XTL set to scan the voice channels and had issues I suspect you were not set to CQPSK.
User avatar
Pj
Moderator
Posts: 5147
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: X9000 thru APX

Re: simulcast monitoring

Post by Pj »

Is the system digital or analog? You only said trunked. In reality, it doesn't matter if its trunked or conventional. On the systems I have listened to in trunked/conventional, digital/analog I had the same results.

Just about everyone these days use a GPS reference for the timing, but that doesn't mean that the radio itself is in perfect alignment. So depending on your location, anything could be possible.

But as the poster above stated, if in digital you want to use the CPQSK (or whatever it is as I can't see it on edit) for a digital simulcast system.
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
Image
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”