RAN4041? VHF R2 antenna

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
FireCpt809
Posts: 1848
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Alot..

RAN4041? VHF R2 antenna

Post by FireCpt809 »

This is the antenna for a CP100 and RDX does this have the same SMA as the Astro series? Im thinking about picking one up to try on my XTS5000 as the standard whip seems to get pretty bent up under my bunker coat. The base of the RAN4041 looks a little beefer. Opinions?
Will
Posts: 6823
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm

Re: RAN4041? VHF R2 antenna

Post by Will »

Get yourself a Centurion antenna they last longer, are made differently and work better... My too cents.
User avatar
FireCpt809
Posts: 1848
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Alot..

Re: RAN4041? VHF R2 antenna

Post by FireCpt809 »

I had one It was way to flexible worse than the OEM.
User avatar
abrasowski
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 12:11 pm
What radios do you own?: CDM1250s, CP200, RDXs, DTR550

Re: RAN4041? VHF R2 antenna

Post by abrasowski »

Yes. I have tried the reverse, XTS UHF whip antenna on the RDX series UHF radios...fits pretty well. The XTS antenna was ever so slightly smaller in diameter but nothing to ruin perofrmance or fit. I actually am looking at the XPR SMA stubby antennas as an alternative to the long UHF/VHF stock antennas on the RDX and CP110 series.

As for your initial reasoning, I don't think the RDX antenna is any more durable than the XTS antenna, regardless of its larger base.
--
Alexander
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”