spectra RR prog. cable question

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
The Kreick
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:22 pm

spectra RR prog. cable question

Post by The Kreick »

i have the cable to program the low power STD & 900 spectras & it has 12 vdc inbound to the radio on db15 pin 5, but the RR spectra shows VIP 1 IN on pin 5 & i dont see where the 12vdc needs to go. Is pin 5 still correct? The rest of the prog. cable looks the same.


tnx,

joe k8icv
User avatar
Pj
Moderator
Posts: 5147
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: X9000 thru APX

Re: spectra RR prog. cable question

Post by Pj »

The normal spectra low/mid power programming cable will work just fine unmodified for the railroad spectra.

However, you will need a SLOW computer to run the RSS if you don't have one (think 286 class).
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
Image
The Kreick
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:22 pm

Re: spectra RR prog. cable question

Post by The Kreick »

PJ-

tnx - i see now that nO 12 vdc is applied on the RR rigs..... i am using a 25 mhz toughbook w/moslo at 10% - the software opens (any higher i get the divide by 0 error), but im wondering if it is still too fast? My guess is yes.......


joe
Will
Posts: 6823
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm

Re: spectra RR prog. cable question

Post by Will »

On the RR Spectra, DO NOT connect the red wire from the programming cable, and do not short it to anything (GND).

The cable will provide power for your RIB. (If the cable and RIB are Orig Motorola)

The RR Spectra RSS only runs in pure DOS, ver 6 or later. It wil NOT run on a windows computer or with Moslow.
Spectra Railroad RVN-4099B Jul-95 per the compatibility listing should run on a Pentium......
k2hz
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:27 am

Re: spectra RR prog. cable question

Post by k2hz »

Will wrote:Spectra Railroad RVN-4099B Jul-95 per the compatibility listing should run on a Pentium......
I have that version (R04.05.01) it does not even like a 486/33 with a clean DOS 6.22 boot. It works on some radios but will error out after about 10-15 blocks read on others.

I have found a 486/25 is the fastest PC that it is stable on. It is happiest running on my old 386SX/20. It actually runs smoother and faster on the 368 than the 486.
Will
Posts: 6823
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm

Re: spectra RR prog. cable question

Post by Will »

k2hz wrote:
Will wrote:Spectra Railroad RVN-4099B Jul-95 per the compatibility listing should run on a Pentium......
I have that version (R04.05.01) it does not even like a 486/33 with a clean DOS 6.22 boot. It works on some radios but will error out after about 10-15 blocks read on others.

I have found a 486/25 is the fastest PC that it is stable on. It is happiest running on my old 386SX/20. It actually runs smoother and faster on the 368 than the 486.

Some computer-Motorola RIB combination will give you the same errors. There is an incompatibility with the Radio Interface Boxes and the RS232 Serial ports on some computers. The solution was to fix the RIB to speak better RS232.
User avatar
Pj
Moderator
Posts: 5147
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: X9000 thru APX

Re: spectra RR prog. cable question

Post by Pj »

One option that many overlook is to go into the BIOS and change the computer speed from normal or turbo to Compatable. This typically brings the computer down the the usual 10mhz or so and works well.

My RSS computer has one of those 486 to 586 chips in them, and doing that runs the oldest Moto software out there.
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
Image
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”