Minitor 5 Feature Question

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Two Tone
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:47 am

Minitor 5 Feature Question

Post by Two Tone »

I was wondering what kind of new features you all would like to see in the Minitor 5 if they ever come out with one.
User avatar
Bob
Posts: 1006
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Bob »

I've heard that it won't be much more than a narrowband version of the Minitor 4. Whatever it ends up being, it'll probably still be crap.
Gigs
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by Gigs »

First and foremost, better reception. Second, and ease of use, would like to see (mainly under the "user" coding option) the option (such as you can change the on/off duty function choice), the ability to have a "beep" alert or a "steady" alert tone by choice of each tone. Additonally, I wish the option of having BOTH alert and vibrate (at same time) was available.
User avatar
Two Tone
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:47 am

Post by Two Tone »

Different types of alert tones would be cool
User avatar
alex
Administrator
Posts: 5762
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by alex »

Gigs wrote:I wish the option of having BOTH alert and vibrate (at same time) was available.
That would be cool...

The difference with the beeping/steady tone:

Beeping would be an individual call, and a steady tone would be a group call -

We have 200 pages here for administrative issues for example, and 980 pages for an emergency... 980 would be the staggard alert tone, 200 would be the steady tone.

-Alex
User avatar
Wes
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Wes »

First of all, it would need to work properly, then if they get that figured out I would like to see.......

A) The option to have vibe & alert together if wanted.

B) The option to have priority or non-priority scan while in the alert (muted) position.

***I KNOW THE POSSIBILITY IS THERE THAT YOU CAN MISS A PAGE!!! I STILL WANT THAT FEATURE)

C) A third and fourth channel if needed. (Total of 3 or 4 different rx freqs.)


My $.02....

Wes
Wes Hutchens
911 Telecommunicator/2-Way Sales & Service
Image
User avatar
Pj
Moderator
Posts: 5147
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: X9000 thru APX

Post by Pj »

My new Min4 does beep for the dept, tone for the all call...
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
Image
User avatar
kf4sqb
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 9:11 pm
What radios do you own?: I can't enter that much....

Post by kf4sqb »

Personally, I would like to see it actually work. The Minitor III I used to carry was a total POS, and the IV I carry now is an even bigger POS.
brett "dot" kitchens "at" marel "dot" com



Look for the new "Jedi" series portables!

Bat-Phone= BAT-CAVE (2283)

-.- .. ....- -.-. -.-- . .. ... -- -.-- -... .-. --- - .... . .-. .-.-.-
User avatar
fire_master_21
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 3:23 pm
What radios do you own?: Motorola/Kenwood

Post by fire_master_21 »

kf4sqb Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:58 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Personally, I would like to see it actually work. The Minitor III I used to carry was a total POS, and the IV I carry now is an even bigger POS.

I agree the III was a POS but I like my IV. My IV works better than the dept. portables ( but not better than mine :wink: ) in the next town over.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
User avatar
jim
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by jim »

I'd like to see Kenwood design them.
User avatar
Wes
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Wes »

Jim, I'm with you all the way!!!!!!!!!!!

Wes
Wes Hutchens
911 Telecommunicator/2-Way Sales & Service
Image
User avatar
frodo
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 7:38 am

Post by frodo »

Being able to program PL's for the open channels would be nice.
User avatar
nmfire10
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 4109
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 4:41 pm

Post by nmfire10 »

jim wrote:I'd like to see Kenwood design them.
What?? WHY! Then it would be better, cheaper, more durable, last longer, better service, and easy to program for the end user. Who would want that?!?!!?!? :P
"I'll eat you like a plate of bacon and eggs in the morning. "
- Some loser on rr.com

eBay at it's finest:
Me: "What exactly is a 900Mhz UHF CB?"
Them: "A very nice CB at 900Mhz speed!"

:-?
WB2IID
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 5:53 pm

Post by WB2IID »

I've heard that the Minitor 5 is supposed to be a little taller to accomodate a better lowband antenna. Also, the battery may be a slide-on/slide/off thing rather than the cell type batteries used in all the others.

As a result the Min III/IV chargers won't work, the batteries will be unique (and more expensive) and who knows what else. Supposedly the thing will be in production by the end of Q1 2005.

Yeah; we'll see.
nyghthawk
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:00 pm

min iii a pos

Post by nyghthawk »

Used to work for a rotomola shop who did a lot of pager work. The most common reason for min 3s failing that we saw was the controller chip popping off the board (big M says it was designed with the controller chip on a stress point of the board.) 'M's offical fix was a piece of foam rubber with a sticky back which you stuck on the inside of the case to press down on the chip. Not the best fix in the world, still got all sorts of weird problems from loose controlers.
User avatar
nmfire10
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 4109
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 4:41 pm

Post by nmfire10 »

WB2IID wrote:I've heard that the Minitor 5 is supposed to be a little taller to accomodate a better lowband antenna. Also, the battery may be a slide-on/slide/off thing rather than the cell type batteries used in all the others.

As a result the Min III/IV chargers won't work, the batteries will be unique (and more expensive) and who knows what else. Supposedly the thing will be in production by the end of Q1 2005.

Yeah; we'll see.
Ok. So add "incompatible" to the stupid list for the Minitor.
"I'll eat you like a plate of bacon and eggs in the morning. "
- Some loser on rr.com

eBay at it's finest:
Me: "What exactly is a 900Mhz UHF CB?"
Them: "A very nice CB at 900Mhz speed!"

:-?
Ett1033
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Ett1033 »

telescopic antenna

a few more tones

different alert tones

important to keep knobs for the function, the other brands that have push button require you to look at the unit to make a function change
User avatar
Hoseman292
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:37 pm
What radios do you own?: too many

Post by Hoseman292 »

Different alert tones would be SWEET.
An indicator that flashed until the pager is reset manually.
Compatible with Minitor III & IV programming hardware.
Voice storage being factory standard and not optional.
Color choice (white, black, charcoal, or red) like the Minitor I & II's.
User avatar
Jay911
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by Jay911 »

Here are the notes I took during the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs conference in 2002 during a Motorola seminar.
Paging - Minitor pager line has been taken over by CGISS from Paging as of the IV. Concepts being discussed for the next generation (MinV) include liquid crystal displays, trunked and/or digital reception, etc.
--j.
User avatar
fire_master_21
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 3:23 pm
What radios do you own?: Motorola/Kenwood

Post by fire_master_21 »

Quote:
Paging - Minitor pager line has been taken over by CGISS from Paging as of the IV. Concepts being discussed for the next generation (MinV) include liquid crystal displays, trunked and/or digital reception, etc.
Why would they want LCD in a PS pager? I know there are many firefighters like myself who forget to even take off the pager before fire ops begin. Then they will complain that the LCD's suck and mother M should have never even put a LCD in the thing. Just my thoughts on this.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
User avatar
Two Tone
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:47 am

Post by Two Tone »

It would be nice for the Minitor V to decode MDC 1200 Signalling with the LCD screen. Kinda Pointless but cool.
User avatar
Hoseman292
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:37 pm
What radios do you own?: too many

Post by Hoseman292 »

I never considered an APCO-25 digital pager to recieve digital transmissions.

My department along with many others simulcasts the primary dispatch channel to convention systems primarily for voice paging and selective calling. I'm wondering with the creation of a pager that would be capable of doing digital transmissions, why simulcast?

Just a thought,

Tim N3WIR
Silver Spring Maryland
User avatar
Wes
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Wes »

Well if it receives digital trunking, it will prob cost $2000 and still suck and they still wont make parts avaliable for it....
Wes Hutchens
911 Telecommunicator/2-Way Sales & Service
Image
User avatar
Hoseman292
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:37 pm
What radios do you own?: too many

Post by Hoseman292 »

One last item for the MINITOR wishlist:

I recall some time ago in the late 80's Motorola had the Optrix and later, the PMR2000 series alpha-numeric pager.

I'm not sure about the Optrix, but the PMR2000 series had a model where not only would it recieve and display alpha-numeric pages but it also had voice.

It would be great if the next line of Minitor pagers had two recievers built in one pager where one could use VHF or UHF for tone and voice for quik call paging.

The other reciever being on 900 Mhz which would work in conjuction with FLEX or digital paging. This way one could use one pager instead of two to get both digital pages as well as tone and voice alerted.

It would have a nice big speaker for voice and a GOOD SIZED LCD to display the alpha-numeric paging information.

Okay... I'm done with this topic... well, atleast I hope so!

Holla atcha later guys,
Tim
N3WIR
Silver Spring Maryland
User avatar
Two Tone
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:47 am

Post by Two Tone »

Does anyone have a pic of ethier the Optrix or the PMR2000
User avatar
Hoseman292
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:37 pm
What radios do you own?: too many

Post by Hoseman292 »

There's a PMR2000 up for auction now on eBay.

http://i14.ebayimg.com/03/i/01/72/f1/2d_1_b.JPG


I would guess that this pager used GOLAY for paging. Most paging companies these days either use FLEX or POCSAG.

Here is the link to the auction.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... eName=WDVW

Tim
Silver Spring Maryland
Jason
Posts: 802
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 4:00 pm

Min5

Post by Jason »

There was a hybrid version of the Keynote that was Voice/Digital Display. Ive seen a few here and there, mostly ex'gov stuff
User avatar
Hoseman292
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:37 pm
What radios do you own?: too many

Post by Hoseman292 »

Jason,

I completely forgot about the Keynote. I believe there was an auction for several of these on eBay not too long ago. They were on 154.1600.

What made me think of a tone/voice/digital pager was seeing many of my friends and co-workers wearing two pagers while on call. I'm thinking in this day and age with synthesized hardware and components, what would be complicated about manufacturing a pager that could do both? Well... to answer my own question, the most complicated concept would be installing two completely different systems (analog and digital) in one case. :-?

Anyhow, thanks for the reminder.

Tim
Silver Spring Maryland
jmr3865
2 Warnings for RSS/CPS Wanted/For Sale
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 11:33 am
What radios do you own?: KW tk2170, tk730, etc.

Post by jmr3865 »

Ok, after they get the pager straightened out, I would like to see:

at least 4 recieve channels with the scan function
to be able to have select call for two channels at the same time
the min 4 design but yet a better belt clip like the I had which locked but updated.
The minitor 2 beep (the best)
the option to beep and viberate at the same time.
better reception
to adjust the onduty and off duty on the programmer per tone
and finally a new EMERGENCY feature, Since most FF's bring their pagers in the fire with them, There should be an emergency transmitting feature which would allow the pager to have a switch that can be switched and the monitor button could be used as a transmit button for an emergency, yea only 3 watts or so, but its better than a poke with a sharp stick in an emergency situation.

My 2 cents
JMR
KC2QVO
ASTROMODAT
Posts: 1825
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 12:32 am

Post by ASTROMODAT »

A big percentage of the world is hoping and praying that it will support IMBE. This is the most important issue with the V.
User avatar
EOppegaard
Posts: 287
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:07 pm

Post by EOppegaard »

jmr3865 wrote: and finally a new EMERGENCY feature, Since most FF's bring their pagers in the fire with them, There should be an emergency transmitting feature which would allow the pager to have a switch that can be switched and the monitor button could be used as a transmit button for an emergency, yea only 3 watts or so, but its better than a poke with a sharp stick in an emergency situation.
You're right. That would be really nice. However there are some radios out there both by kenwood and Mother M that are just a tid bit bigger than a minitor, and can do paging as well. Kinda like just get rid of the pager and give them a little radio.
Eric Oppegaard
Where's Oppie?
cfdeng3
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by cfdeng3 »

How about to have a wider range like 460-480Mhz
Cowthief
Fail 01/90
Posts: 1900
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm

Fire pagers.

Post by Cowthief »

Hello.

I will be the first to tell you a know nothing about fire equipment.
What I do know is what is out for paging equipment for RCCs.
A pager with a transmitter is called a talk-back pager, mamma /\/\ has made them in the past.
A pager that can do 2 tone or 5 tone and voice and POCSAG have been out from motorola since the BPR-2000 series.
Yes, this is correctly called a hybrid.
A pager that can do 2 channels at once, with 2 full RF sections,is called a duplex pager or guard band pager.
Duplex pagers were sold to the public under the coverage plus name by motorola, usually a VHF and 900 mix.
And, RCC equipment worked, and worked well.
Almost all cell phones can do alerts and ringtones galore and be set for whatever incoming number.
So, I do not see what the problem with /\/\ is.
User avatar
nmfire10
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 4109
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 4:41 pm

Post by nmfire10 »

As long as the "little radio" can meet the same durability standards as the big fireground radios.
"I'll eat you like a plate of bacon and eggs in the morning. "
- Some loser on rr.com

eBay at it's finest:
Me: "What exactly is a 900Mhz UHF CB?"
Them: "A very nice CB at 900Mhz speed!"

:-?
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”