"Eavsdrop Eliminator" on /\/\ Talkabouts

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
kyledooley
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: XTSs

"Eavsdrop Eliminator" on /\/\ Talkabouts

Post by kyledooley »

Does anyone know what type of technology is used in "Eavesdrop Eliminator" FRS/GMRS Talkabouts? Is it DVP, Securenet or something of the like?

Also I thought FRS/GMRS was like Ham operation, with thumbs down for any scrabled/encrypted/coded transmissions.

Thanks,

Kyle
User avatar
alex
Administrator
Posts: 5762
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by alex »

Securenet!?! I think not.

Should be simple voice inversion.

-Alex
User avatar
Dale Earnhardt
Posts: 848
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Dale Earnhardt »

I heard that before, I thought my radio was messing with me lol,

Its those cheapie voice scrambler, that make it sound like donald duck, just very bad lol, need to check those radio out, who makes thsoe anways, wanna get one an djust take the damn thing apart,
RADIOMAN2002
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: More than I can count

Encryption on FRS

Post by RADIOMAN2002 »

I have seen some of both Motorola and Kenwood have voice inversion scramblers. Not very hard to decode. If you want encryption, use a Saber and use DES, DVP, DVI or whatever is your fancy.
evanh
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by evanh »

I'm not sure, but I think that it's just another name for CTCSS squelch. It eliminates evesdropping about as well as Private Line squelch made transmissions 'private'.

EH
RadioSouth
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 2884
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by RadioSouth »

There's been a lot of misnomers used to describe FRS radios. Probaby due
to the fact that they're be marketed by folks that probably have close to
zero knowledge on the topic. PL/DPL has been described as 'Privacy Codes' (actually think some of the manuf. are calling them that also).
Also I've seen some genuises stating they have 532 channels (14 freq X
38 codes). Cobra does offer 'scrambling' in some of their models and I was also surprised to see scrambling offered on many marine radios.
kyledooley
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: XTSs

Post by kyledooley »

Thanks for the replies, guys.

Its definitely not PL, because that is a separate feature in the features list. Motorola usually describes it as 14 channel X 38 privacy codes.

This specifically says here it "Scrambles" your voice so that it is unintelligible to others sharing the channel.

Its definitely not Securenet, because it has to be cheap. These radios go for like $100 a pair. but I'm sure it is some other sort of motorola technology because they aren't exactly known for using other's technology.

Voice inversion is the most likely answer, but I haven't heard any of these radios in action to know for sure.

http://commerce.motorola.com/cgi-bin/nc ... ne%20Radio

T6310 description says "Eavsdrop Reducer with 3 scramble settings"

K.
Susan157
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 5:15 pm

Yes try use privacy on FRS

Post by Susan157 »

:wink:
Pl and DPL are devices progammed in radios for many years.
When u place PL (ctcss) or Dpl into a radio then the audio to the speaker is filtered out, until the correct tone that was programmed
is present ,then u hear the message.However with a scanner or cs on the receiver then u hear any message.Privacy
is not the same.There are many types of signalling being used.
The FRS radios can use both. It is the cost that makes the difference.
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”