Any Good Glass Mount UHF 450-480mhz antenna's?

The General forum is where users can discuss any topic regarding Motorola communications equipment - hardware, software, etc. There are also several focused forums on this board, so please take the time to ensure that your questions doesn't fall into one of those categories before posting here!

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
voltagex18
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 8:24 pm

Any Good Glass Mount UHF 450-480mhz antenna's?

Post by voltagex18 »

Hi everybody,

Just bought a new car and I've been hesitant on drilling through my roof to put up my UHF antenna. I was wondering if anybody knew of a good glass mount antenna to use. The radio I plan to use with this antenna is a CDM-1250. Let me know.... all suggestions appreciated.

--= Eric
DJP126
Posts: 873
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 6:41 am
What radios do you own?: What's a radio?

Post by DJP126 »

Just my opinion...

Best bet - Drill the hole

Next best - Trunk lip mount

Next - Magnetic mount

Last is glass
Dave
kc7gr
Posts: 1032
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Motorola, Icom, Sunair (HF).

Most definitely agree!

Post by kc7gr »

DJP126 is right. If you don't want to drill holes, look at trunk lip mount next, followed by mag-mount.

Glass mount is a bad idea for two reasons. First, poor ground plane at best. I made the mistake of using glass mounts for amateur transceivers in my old Bronco II. It was a disaster! RF got into everything, and I had bad performance to boot.

73 de KC7GR
Image
Bruce Lane, KC7GR
"Raf tras spintern. Raf tras spoit."
rocketman
Batboard $upporter
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 10:03 am

glass mount antennas

Post by rocketman »

Glass mount antennas are a compromise for performance. Personal experience has found a body mount (NMO) provides the best performance. Depending on the needed bandwidth, a 1/4 wave should perform well over a wide frequency range.
User avatar
kf4sqb
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 9:11 pm
What radios do you own?: I can't enter that much....

Post by kf4sqb »

Change your subject to "any good glass mount antennas", and you will still get a resounding "NO!!" .:o
brett "dot" kitchens "at" marel "dot" com



Look for the new "Jedi" series portables!

Bat-Phone= BAT-CAVE (2283)

-.- .. ....- -.-. -.-- . .. ... -- -.-- -... .-. --- - .... . .-. .-.-.-
User avatar
ricciticcitembo
Posts: 730
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by ricciticcitembo »

Yup. Agree with everybody above. I got an antennex 400Mhz
Glassmount, and it sucked SO bad on TX especially compared with
a rooftop (Big ass 3/4" hole) NMO mounted Thick Maxrad 1/4 wave.

I really like those thick elements on the Maxrad UHF and VHF 1/4 waves.
Excellent VSWR ratio of 1:1 ,across a good range to boot, and cheap.
Too bad you gotta drill a hole to get the most benifit from it. Oh well.

Like the other guys said, glassmount is last choice for sure.
larryepage
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by larryepage »

A glass mount antenna loses at least half of your signal (3 db) to start. If it is on a tinted window, that's at least 3 db more. In addition, most of the films used to tint windows are metallized. This (usually) non-grounded sheet of "metal" is why you get so much secondary radiation, loss, and poor SWR. Also...the lost energy goes mostly into the glass. I have seen a couple of cases where the glass got so hot with extended transmit that it shattered (no, not my own, thank goodness).

All that said, you can still make a case that a wet piece of string outside a vehicle is better than anything you can do with an inside antenna.

I do not have an answer to your actual question concerning the 'best' glass mount antenna. My guess is that the differences between the antennas are fairly small compared to the difference between a glass mount and one of the other options.

Regards,
Larry Page
W5LEP
FCC GROL
User avatar
kf4sqb
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 9:11 pm
What radios do you own?: I can't enter that much....

Post by kf4sqb »

Speaking of a "glass mount", ya'll are going to love this! I know someone who deceided that he already had enough holes for antennas in his truck. So he built his own "glass mount" for his UHF PAC-RT. He simply stripped the outer jacket off of the end of a piece of coax to the proper length for a 1\4 wavelength, folded the braid back and attached two 1/4 wave lengths of 22 guage solid wire to the braid to form a "t" for a ground plane, stripped the inner insulator from the center conductor of the coax, and used Scotch tape to attach the center conductor to the inside of the rear side window of his Suburban, with the ground plane and coax hidden behind the inside trim panel. The window in question is factory tinted, so the "antenna" practicaly dissapears. As this is only for a PAC, it seems to work pretty well. A little off-topic, I guess, but I thought ya'll might get a kick out of this! :lol:
brett "dot" kitchens "at" marel "dot" com



Look for the new "Jedi" series portables!

Bat-Phone= BAT-CAVE (2283)

-.- .. ....- -.-. -.-- . .. ... -- -.-- -... .-. --- - .... . .-. .-.-.-
voltagex18
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 8:24 pm

Post by voltagex18 »

Thanks guys for all the ideas and suggestions. I really which though there was a good alternate sollution to drilling.

--= Eric

Any other ideas.... keep'm comming
User avatar
kf4sqb
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 9:11 pm
What radios do you own?: I can't enter that much....

Post by kf4sqb »

Well, mag-mounts generally work OK. Just watch where you route the coax and remove the mag base every now and then to clean under it/let it dry under it.
brett "dot" kitchens "at" marel "dot" com



Look for the new "Jedi" series portables!

Bat-Phone= BAT-CAVE (2283)

-.- .. ....- -.-. -.-- . .. ... -- -.-- -... .-. --- - .... . .-. .-.-.-
central150
Posts: 750
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Too many..

Post by central150 »

I had a glass mount...sucked! I grew a set of ball$ and drilled through the roof. My RX and TX is vastly improved from the dreaded glass mount.

-Tony
Haloncloud
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by Haloncloud »

I have roof mount NMO and glass mount ant. As for performance I am just as happy with my Glass mount as NMO roof. As for glass mount I'm going to recommend the Larson line they have several diffrent setups UHF, VHF and Dualband. I use the Dualband on my truck and have had a antenna analizer on it and had good SWR numbers in 450-480. If you dont mind spending the money try a glass mount and see if it gives you the performance you need if not I would recommend roof mount NMO. Well thats just my two cents.

Haloncloud
Post Reply

Return to “General Motorola Solutions & Legacy Radio Discussion”