radios and the fcc
Moderator: Queue Moderator
- Astro_Saber
- Fail 01/90
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm
-
- Posts: 1747
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 4:00 pm
it is very wrong. Those friends that are hams should know better.
What band are you guys going to use?
Why not use MURS VHF? Or FRS UHF?
Heck, better yet, why not have everyone in the group get the Tech Class Ham ticket. It's really not THAT hard to take.
Please, don't ask if it's okay to use a band that you are not entitled to. I think the answer is pretty obvious. It would really help everyone's blood pressure.
_________________
Jonathan KC8RYW
<small style="color: springgreen; ">I'm voting Green in 2004! <a href="http://www.takethepledge.com/">www.take ... /a></small>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: KC8RYW on 2002-03-31 17:24 ]</font>
What band are you guys going to use?
Why not use MURS VHF? Or FRS UHF?
Heck, better yet, why not have everyone in the group get the Tech Class Ham ticket. It's really not THAT hard to take.
Please, don't ask if it's okay to use a band that you are not entitled to. I think the answer is pretty obvious. It would really help everyone's blood pressure.
_________________
Jonathan KC8RYW
<small style="color: springgreen; ">I'm voting Green in 2004! <a href="http://www.takethepledge.com/">www.take ... /a></small>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: KC8RYW on 2002-03-31 17:24 ]</font>
- Astro_Saber
- Fail 01/90
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm
-
- Posts: 1747
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 4:00 pm
If you are using ham HT's in case of emergency, being unlicenced really doesn't matter. When a human life is at stake, the rules can be bent. I'm sure other hams and the FCC would cut you some major slack.
FYI: you can apply this rule to any radio service you can think of. If it helps save a human life in an emergency, then it can be justified.
However, rag-chewing with others in your group is an entirely differant situation altogether.
Contrary to popular belief, the FCC probably won't be the one listening in and waiting for you to operate illegally.
Your major threat when operating unlicenced in the ham bands will be other licenced hams scanning. The overwhelming majority of us hams don't want our service turing into CB.
I suggest that your group start saving up for some MURS HT's for next time.
FYI: you can apply this rule to any radio service you can think of. If it helps save a human life in an emergency, then it can be justified.
However, rag-chewing with others in your group is an entirely differant situation altogether.
Contrary to popular belief, the FCC probably won't be the one listening in and waiting for you to operate illegally.
Your major threat when operating unlicenced in the ham bands will be other licenced hams scanning. The overwhelming majority of us hams don't want our service turing into CB.
I suggest that your group start saving up for some MURS HT's for next time.
73 DE KC8RYW
Random Motorola Part Number:
SYN1894B - V3m Sprint-branded Battery Cover
Random Motorola Part Number:
SYN1894B - V3m Sprint-branded Battery Cover
- Astro_Saber
- Fail 01/90
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm
-
- Posts: 1747
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 4:00 pm
What band? VHF-Hi or UHF?On 2002-03-31 23:50, Astro_Saber wrote:
they would be Sabers anyway
If they are VHF, then program in MURS.
If they are UHF, then program in FRS.
Use a DPL tone, to avoid kiddie radio interference.
73 DE KC8RYW
Random Motorola Part Number:
SYN1894B - V3m Sprint-branded Battery Cover
Random Motorola Part Number:
SYN1894B - V3m Sprint-branded Battery Cover
-
- Posts: 1747
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 4:00 pm
MURS might be legal, if the power is under 2 watts PEP. Part 90 (read: Saber) radios are approved for MURS (as long as they can put off 2 watts PEP or less.)On 2002-04-01 01:16, HumHead wrote:
Not that either of those options would be any more legal than unlicensed ham use anyway................
I suppose FRS is pushing it though. According to the FCC, we're supposed to have a un-removable antenna, and 500 mW ERP of power. And, an FRS type-approval. TalkAbout getting your signal nowhere

I'm pretty sure that the FCC won't cry because you used 5 watts on MURS, in the middle of nowhere.
This topic is becoming stale.
_________________
Jonathan KC8RYW
<small style="color: springgreen; ">I'm voting Green in 2004! <a href="http://www.takethepledge.com/">www.take ... /a></small>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: KC8RYW on 2002-04-01 02:43 ]</font>
- Tom in D.C.
- Posts: 3859
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: Progreso soup can with CRT
Two points:
1. MURS requires type-accepted equipment. You're not supposed to just set up a VHF HT for MURS, if you follow the rules, because for one thing MURS requires sliver-band deviation.
2. In an life-or-death emergency, anyone anywhere can use any radio on any channel. No rules have to be bent to do this.
Tom, W2NJS
...in D.C.
P.S. I commend all of you guys who were quick to point out the legalities involved in this "situation." Contrary to commonly held belief, the FCC IS out there catching people. Not everyone by far, but enough of them to make one think twice before trying anything really dumb, with unlicensed amateur frequency operation being right up there with the dumbest. Read QST if you don't believe this is true.
1. MURS requires type-accepted equipment. You're not supposed to just set up a VHF HT for MURS, if you follow the rules, because for one thing MURS requires sliver-band deviation.
2. In an life-or-death emergency, anyone anywhere can use any radio on any channel. No rules have to be bent to do this.
Tom, W2NJS
...in D.C.
P.S. I commend all of you guys who were quick to point out the legalities involved in this "situation." Contrary to commonly held belief, the FCC IS out there catching people. Not everyone by far, but enough of them to make one think twice before trying anything really dumb, with unlicensed amateur frequency operation being right up there with the dumbest. Read QST if you don't believe this is true.
Any use on MURS requires narrow banded transmitters with nomore that 2.5khz deviation and max of two watts ERP.
§ 95.401 Radio Services
(f) The Multi-Use Radio Service (MURS) -- a private, two-way, short distance voice, data or image communications service for personal
or business activities of the general public. The rules for this service are contained in subpart J of this part.
§ 95.631 Emission types.
j) A MURS station may transmit any emission type as specified in § 90.207 of this chapter.
95.632 MURS transmitter frequencies.
(a) The MURS transmitter channel frequencies are: 151.820 MHz, 151.880 MHz 151.940 MHz 154.570 MHz 154.600 MHz.
(b) The authorized bandwidth is 11.25 kHz on frequencies 151.820 MHz, 151.880 MHz and
151.940 MHz.
The authorized bandwidth is 12.5 kHz on frequencies 154.570 and 154.600 kHz.
c) MURS transmitters must maintain a frequency stability of 5.0 ppm, or 2.0 ppm if designed to operate with a 6.25 kHz bandwidth.
§ 95.639 Maximum transmitter power.
(h) No MURS unit, under any condition of modulation, shall exceed 2 watts effective radiated power (ERP).
§ 95.401 Radio Services
(f) The Multi-Use Radio Service (MURS) -- a private, two-way, short distance voice, data or image communications service for personal
or business activities of the general public. The rules for this service are contained in subpart J of this part.
§ 95.631 Emission types.
j) A MURS station may transmit any emission type as specified in § 90.207 of this chapter.
95.632 MURS transmitter frequencies.
(a) The MURS transmitter channel frequencies are: 151.820 MHz, 151.880 MHz 151.940 MHz 154.570 MHz 154.600 MHz.
(b) The authorized bandwidth is 11.25 kHz on frequencies 151.820 MHz, 151.880 MHz and
151.940 MHz.
The authorized bandwidth is 12.5 kHz on frequencies 154.570 and 154.600 kHz.
c) MURS transmitters must maintain a frequency stability of 5.0 ppm, or 2.0 ppm if designed to operate with a 6.25 kHz bandwidth.
§ 95.639 Maximum transmitter power.
(h) No MURS unit, under any condition of modulation, shall exceed 2 watts effective radiated power (ERP).
- Astro_Saber
- Fail 01/90
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm
- Astro_Saber
- Fail 01/90
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm
- Astro_Saber
- Fail 01/90
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Contrary to popular belief, the rules of Part 97 (ham rules) apply to ONLY to part 97, and do not cross to other radio venues. For example, the statement "can use any frequency anywhere to summon help" (and I paraphrase, I don't know the exact wording) is *IN* Part 97. Therefore, what that means is a *HAM* may use any *HAM* frequency (a Tech could use HF for example) to summon help. That does NOT grant a ham to use public service frequencies to summon help. Now, with this said, would I? Darn right I would... I'd understand the consequences taken after the fact, as these transmissions would be illegal, and I'd understand that as such...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: pmb1010 on 2002-04-02 20:09 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: pmb1010 on 2002-04-02 20:09 ]</font>
-
- No Longer Registered
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 4:00 pm
What is wrong with using MURS radios? You can get a good three solid miles outdoors with a Motorola portable type accepted for this service? You wouldn't piss anyone off and you would be 100 percent legal.On 2002-03-31 17:14, Astro_Saber wrote:
going to go up into a remote area and use radios to communicate within a 3-5mile area max.
some are hams some are not
if we use the ham bands on portables is it really wrong if some arent hams?
probally use the radios within 3-5 hours tops
Piracy on the ham bands is a bad thing. Especially if you are a ham, you should know better. One of the reasons the FCC is looking long and hard at getting rid of some of the service is because of the blatant abuses that go on, like the above, malicous interference, questionable radio traffic, etc. I could understand this maybe years ago, when we didn't have MURS, FRS and so many other license free and CHEAP radios out there, but in my mind there is no excuse.
No it is not the crime of the century. But wrong is wrong. And anyone who is a true member of the amateur service wouldn't even think twice. Just my two cents.